Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:  
''This proposal is based around the needs of the OLPC project in Australia, but reflects a common need (current or future) of other OLPC implementations as well.''
 
''This proposal is based around the needs of the OLPC project in Australia, but reflects a common need (current or future) of other OLPC implementations as well.''
   −
'''The problem:''' Previously, Daniel Drake implemented a mechanism for automatic activities updates. This was of great help for OLPC deployments such as Australia. However, the current mechanism will update (or install) ALL the activities in the updates list. This becomes a problem when not all the activities are intended for automatic updates, ie., when the bundle size is too big for massive automatic installation.
+
'''The problem:''' Previously, Daniel Drake implemented a mechanism for automatic activities updates. This was of great help for OLPC deployments such as Australia. However, the current mechanism will update (or install) ALL the activities in the updates list. This becomes a problem when not all the activities are intended for automatic updates, ie., when the bundle size is too big for massive automatic installation. In the practice deployments do not enable automatic updates because this kind of concerns.
   −
The proposed solution is to provide a way to mark activities in the microformat file as "optional". Activities marked as optional will:
+
The proposed solution is to provide a way to mark activities in the microformat file as optional. Activities marked as optional will:
    
* Not be updated or installed during automatic updates.
 
* Not be updated or installed during automatic updates.
572

edits

Navigation menu