10,579
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 41:
Line 41: − +
→Sugar Activities
|-
|-
!valign=top | [[File:confusion.png|90px|thumb|center]] ||valign=top width="15%" style="background:#e3e4e5;" |Beyond Flashcards: Programming to ReadJS||valign=top width="15%" | and Walter Bender||align=left valign=top|
!valign=top | [[File:confusion.png|90px|thumb|center]] ||valign=top width="15%" style="background:#e3e4e5;" |Beyond Flashcards: Programming to ReadJS||valign=top width="15%" | Walter Bender||align=left valign=top|
;Brief explanation: Back in the 1980s, IBM had a literacy program, "Writing to Read". The gist was that writing was a great way to spark a child's interest in reading. What if writing code could achieve a similar result? The project is to explore how programming might be incorporated into a literacy program. Like turtle, only simple sentences instead of stacks. It would be a "whole word" approach rather than a "phonics" approach: they can take "sentences" and make paragraphs that result in animations.
;Brief explanation: Back in the 1980s, IBM had a literacy program, "Writing to Read". The gist was that writing was a great way to spark a child's interest in reading. What if writing code could achieve a similar result? The project is to explore how programming might be incorporated into a literacy program. Like turtle, only simple sentences instead of stacks. It would be a "whole word" approach rather than a "phonics" approach: they can take "sentences" and make paragraphs that result in animations.
;Expected results: Working prototype
;Expected results: Working prototype