1,286
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: − * Sure, that's why its "licenses COMPATIBLE with the GNU GPL" :) [[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])+ + +
→GNU General Public License only?
Aren't some activities public domain or licensed more permissively, e.g. BSD? --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2016 (EDT)
Aren't some activities public domain or licensed more permissively, e.g. BSD? --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 21:22, 19 April 2016 (EDT)
: Sure, that's why its "licenses COMPATIBLE with the GNU GPL" :) --[[User:Davelab6|Davelab6]] ([[User talk:Davelab6|talk]])
:: Oh, I see, you mean compatible in ''that'' direction not ''that'' direction. :-) Would a reference to an open source definition be more appropriate? --[[User:Quozl|Quozl]] ([[User talk:Quozl|talk]]) 22:07, 19 April 2016 (EDT)