10,579
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + +
→2017-02-19
Due to confusion about Sugar Labs governance, during 2016 several members of the project not on the SLOB posted motions, but these were not seconded, and have been struck out to show they were considered by some SLOB members are invalid.
Due to confusion about Sugar Labs governance, during 2016 several members of the project not on the SLOB posted motions, but these were not seconded, and have been struck out to show they were considered by some SLOB members are invalid.
== 2017-04-07 ==
[http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-04-07T19:03:42.html]
;AGREED MOTION 2017-05 Llaske, seconded by Walter: Sugar Labs agrees to provide an advance for Ignacio to attend to the GCI summit.<br>(6 votes for)
== 2017-02-19 ==
== 2017-02-19 ==