Line 20: |
Line 20: |
| | | |
| * Who is doing Sugar development? | | * Who is doing Sugar development? |
− | :* Sugar is a community project. Many of the developers are contracted by OLPC, many are volunteers. You can get a raw idea of the people involve from the [[Modules]] page. A few of us are also trying to setup [[Announcing SugarLabs|SugarLabs]], a foundation to sustain development. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] | + | :* Sugar is a community project. Many of the developers are contracted by OLPC, many are volunteers. You can get a raw idea of the people involve from the [[Modules]] page. A few of us are also trying to setup [[Sugar Labs:Announcing Sugar Labs|Sugar Labs]], a foundation to sustain development. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] |
| * What are the priorities for Sugar development? | | * What are the priorities for Sugar development? |
| :* The [http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/marco/sugar-docs;a=blob;f=roadmap.txt;hb=HEAD 1.0 Roadmap] should give you a good idea of what are the medium term priorities. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] | | :* The [http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/marco/sugar-docs;a=blob;f=roadmap.txt;hb=HEAD 1.0 Roadmap] should give you a good idea of what are the medium term priorities. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] |
Line 35: |
Line 35: |
| * Do we have a team of verification volunteers? (Should they be recruited?) | | * Do we have a team of verification volunteers? (Should they be recruited?) |
| :* We don't have one but we should totally recruit it. See my and Walter notes about the verification process on [[Talk:Triage]]. | | :* We don't have one but we should totally recruit it. See my and Walter notes about the verification process on [[Talk:Triage]]. |
− | :: would love to help with this, personally - need to get my feet underneath me first. Also, waiting for sugarlabs to solidify in general before pulling in new people sounds like a good idea. [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 04:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC) | + | :: would love to help with this, personally - need to get my feet underneath me first. Also, waiting for Sugar Labs to solidify in general before pulling in new people sounds like a good idea. [[User:Mchua|Mchua]] 04:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC) |
| * Do we want to make it easier to cross-reference bugs with each other by using something like the [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TracBacksPlugin TracBacks plugin]? (Full disclosure: I wrote this.) Also potentially helpful if there will be a separate Sugar Trac: [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TrashTalkPlugin the TrashTalk plugin], which does external trackbacks to tickets (useful for monitoring upstream/downstream trac instances, for instance). | | * Do we want to make it easier to cross-reference bugs with each other by using something like the [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TracBacksPlugin TracBacks plugin]? (Full disclosure: I wrote this.) Also potentially helpful if there will be a separate Sugar Trac: [http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TrashTalkPlugin the TrashTalk plugin], which does external trackbacks to tickets (useful for monitoring upstream/downstream trac instances, for instance). |
− | :* We are having a discussion about infrastructure by mail, I'll make sure we include you in the next steps. Give this a few days though, we are still defining SugarLabs infrastructure and it's relation to laptop.org. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] | + | :* We are having a discussion about infrastructure by mail, I'll make sure we include you in the next steps. Give this a few days though, we are still defining Sugar Labs infrastructure and it's relation to laptop.org. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] |
| * Do we have a "trac" component on trac (to report something's broken, to request plugins, etc)? Should we? | | * Do we have a "trac" component on trac (to report something's broken, to request plugins, etc)? Should we? |
| :* Yup dev.laptop.org has such component. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] | | :* Yup dev.laptop.org has such component. --[[User:Marcopg|Marcopg]] |