Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/Meeting Minutes-2016-05-06"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ";SLOB members in attendance: walterbender, canoeberry, tony37 ;Community members in attendance: davelab6, icarito, cjl, samsongoddy, kaametza, Ibiam, elih, noemu === Agenda i...") |
|||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Google RISE grant (See [https://www.google.com/edu/resources/programs/google-rise-awards]) | * Google RISE grant (See [https://www.google.com/edu/resources/programs/google-rise-awards]) | ||
* Motion to adopt [[Vision proposal 2016]] | * Motion to adopt [[Vision proposal 2016]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Discussion === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;laboratoriosazucar.org: Dave Crossfield took care of this unilaterally. It was suggested that the lead of the infrastructure team could have handled this without the need for SLOB intervention. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Finance Manager position: It was agreed that we need more discussion on Motion 1 (create a paid position) and Motion 2 (unilateral spending by the finance manager). We agreed that Motions 3 and 4 were ready for an email vote. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Yoruba: We discussed this and will proceed with an email vote. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;GPLv3: We discussed this and will proceed with an email vote. (Walter will include a summary of the rationale for the change.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;GSoC mentor payments: It was viewed favorably in the discussion. We will proceed with an email vote. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Google RISE: It was suggested that local deployments apply; Adam agreed to discuss with Tony at the Conservancy how Sugar Labs might sponsor the work of local deployments that are not non-profit entities (a requirement of the grant). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ;Motion to adopt the Vision proposal: We did not discuss this topic. | ||
== Log == | == Log == | ||
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2016-05-06T16:02:18 | http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2016-05-06T16:02:18 |
Revision as of 16:17, 6 May 2016
- SLOB members in attendance
- walterbender, canoeberry, tony37
- Community members in attendance
- davelab6, icarito, cjl, samsongoddy, kaametza, Ibiam, elih, noemu
Agenda items
We did not have a quorum so we were not able to vote on any of these motions.
- Motion to pay for laboratoriosazucar.org domain (See [1])
- Motions to create Treasurer position (See [2] and [3])
- Motion to do Yoruba i18n (See [4])
- Motion to update the Sugar License from GPLv2 to GPLv3 (See [5])
- Proposal to make GSoC mentor payments to the mentors.
- Google RISE grant (See [6])
- Motion to adopt Vision proposal 2016
Discussion
- laboratoriosazucar.org
- Dave Crossfield took care of this unilaterally. It was suggested that the lead of the infrastructure team could have handled this without the need for SLOB intervention.
- Finance Manager position
- It was agreed that we need more discussion on Motion 1 (create a paid position) and Motion 2 (unilateral spending by the finance manager). We agreed that Motions 3 and 4 were ready for an email vote.
- Yoruba
- We discussed this and will proceed with an email vote.
- GPLv3
- We discussed this and will proceed with an email vote. (Walter will include a summary of the rationale for the change.)
- GSoC mentor payments
- It was viewed favorably in the discussion. We will proceed with an email vote.
- Google RISE
- It was suggested that local deployments apply; Adam agreed to discuss with Tony at the Conservancy how Sugar Labs might sponsor the work of local deployments that are not non-profit entities (a requirement of the grant).
- Motion to adopt the Vision proposal
- We did not discuss this topic.
Log
http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2016-05-06T16:02:18