Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"
< Activity Library | Editors | Policy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== Reasons for retain in sandbox === | === Reasons for retain in sandbox === | ||
| − | * lack of educational value<br>arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator<br>'''A''': add such value :) | + | * (?) lack of educational value<br>arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator<br>'''A''': add such value :) |
* any confusion with already existed activities<br>'''A''': make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc. | * any confusion with already existed activities<br>'''A''': make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc. | ||
* ... | * ... | ||
Revision as of 02:44, 2 December 2009
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
Reasons for removing
- inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
- non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for
other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
- (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros
- ...
Reasons for retain in sandbox
- (?) lack of educational value
arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator
A: add such value :) - any confusion with already existed activities
A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc. - ...