Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"
< Activity Library | Editors | Policy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
RafaelOrtiz (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* inappropriate license, see Oversight Board [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#Non-FOSS_content|meeting notes]] for details | * inappropriate license, see Oversight Board [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#Non-FOSS_content|meeting notes]] for details | ||
| − | === Reasons for retaining | + | === Reasons for retaining or moving to the sandbox === |
| + | |||
| + | * '''Any confusion with already-published activities'''<br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''A''': Make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description, not launching activity, etc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''Buggy activities'''<br> | ||
| + | If the activity is proving not starting or having serious functionality problems, should be retained and/or moved to sandbox. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''A''': Contact the maintainer Developer to notify the issue. | ||
| − | |||
** At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.<br>[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT) | ** At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.<br>[[User:Alsroot|alsroot]] 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
| − | * Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools<br>'''A''': Contact the uploader to clarify the categories choice. | + | |
| + | * '''Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools'''<br> | ||
| + | '''A''': Contact the uploader to clarify the categories choice. | ||
Revision as of 20:49, 17 February 2011
Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.
Reasons for removing
- inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
- inappropriate license, see Oversight Board meeting notes for details
Reasons for retaining or moving to the sandbox
- Any confusion with already-published activities
A: Make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description, not launching activity, etc.
- Buggy activities
If the activity is proving not starting or having serious functionality problems, should be retained and/or moved to sandbox.
A: Contact the maintainer Developer to notify the issue.
- At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.
alsroot 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
- At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.
- Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools
A: Contact the uploader to clarify the categories choice.