Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 +
== Who should be an editor ? ==
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
== Removing, reviewing, removing activities ==
 +
 
Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.
 
Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.
 +
 +
  
 
=== Reasons for removing ===
 
=== Reasons for removing ===

Revision as of 20:52, 17 February 2011

Who should be an editor ?

Removing, reviewing, removing activities

Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.


Reasons for removing

  • inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
  • inappropriate license, see Oversight Board meeting notes for details

Reasons for retaining or moving to the sandbox

  • Any confusion with already-published activities

A: Make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description, not launching activity, etc.

  • Buggy activities

If the activity is proving not starting or having serious functionality problems, should be retained and/or moved to sandbox.

A: Contact the maintainer Developer to notify the issue.

    • At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existing activities and, very importantly, sharing results of these experiments. A new ASLO code base might support having several implementations ("forks" might be too hard a word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.
      alsroot 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)


  • Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools

A: Contact the uploader to clarify the categories choice.