779
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 75:
Line 75: − * should all decisions require the same level of agreement? Maybe changing the rules require a stronger agreement such as unanimity or a greater quorum?+ − * voting medium: IRC, email, something else? If an async medium such as email is chosen, which is the time limit for voting? Some decisions will be urgent.+ + + − * voting system, some options, 1: unanimous consensus needed, 2: unanimous nondissent needed (either consensus or abstain), 3: majority needed, no dissent (at least 4 yea, no nay), 4: simple voting (more yeas than nays).+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Requesting a SLOBs decision (view source)
Revision as of 09:24, 30 October 2009
, 09:24, 30 October 2009→How a SLOBs decision is made
Once the board has agreed on making a decision on a particular issue, we need to define how such decision will be made. Some questions that would matter:
Once the board has agreed on making a decision on a particular issue, we need to define how such decision will be made. Some questions that would matter:
Voting medium:
# IRC
# email
# wiki
Voting timeline:
# immediate in-meeting
## with absentees excluded (including this option for completeness)
## with absentees voting via email to the SLOBs list beforehand
## with absentees delegating/relaying vote to another SLOB who will be present
# voting window opens one week before meeting, closes in meeting
# voting window opens at meeting, closes one week after meeting
# substitute timeframes other than "one week" in above two options
Level of agreement:
Should all decisions require the same level of agreement? Maybe changing the rules require a stronger agreement such as unanimity or a greater quorum?
Voting system:
# unanimous consensus needed
# unanimous nondissent needed (either consensus or abstain)
# majority needed, no dissent (at least 4 yea, no nay)
# simple voting (more yeas than nays voting, period)
=== How a SLOBs decision is announced ===
=== How a SLOBs decision is announced ===