Difference between revisions of "Talk:Interactive Worksheets"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. [[User:Mabbikeel|mabbikeel]] 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC) | + | OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:18, 2 April 2009
How would your proposal differ from just packaging a web view of a locally-run copy of Sage, as a sugar activity? (If the answer is "not at all", that's fine, but you should say that.) Homunq 21:09, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
I'll take a look at Sage. Maybe I should be thinking about working with them instead. mabbikeel 22:05, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
OK, but they're heavy-duty math folks. I doubt that sugarizing is a priority for them, it could be for us if you convinced us it would be a good experience for kids. Sage is awesome, btw. Homunq 18:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)