Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | * SL Community Bugsquad: what is it now, and what do we want it to become?
| + | ==SL Community Bugsquad== |
| + | * what is it now, and what do we want it to become? |
| | | |
− | * Testing: upstream/downstream
| + | == Testing: upstream/downstream == |
| | | |
− | ** Who tests activities?
| + | * Who tests activities? |
− | *** I was almost convinced that it is a downstream task but... OLPC does not support activities (it's an odd case, I know of no downstream project in the same situation). I've seen [[User:Mchua|Mchua's]] post about moving it to Sugar Labs, let's make a good plan on it Wed. [[User:Marcopg]]
| + | ** I was almost convinced that it is a downstream task but... OLPC does not support activities (it's an odd case, I know of no downstream project in the same situation). I've seen [[User:Mchua|Mchua's]] post about moving it to Sugar Labs, let's make a good plan on it Wed. [[User:Marcopg]] |
− | *** I think that Activities should be tested by individual Activity project groups, since Activities are independent subprojects. I don't think that the core Sugar Labs bugsquad should be testing Activities. I also don't think that internal OLPC QA should be testing Activities, other than making sure the ones we ship are ship-quality on XOs (by coordinating with the individual Activity projects, ideally).
| + | ** I think that Activities should be tested by individual Activity project groups, since Activities are independent subprojects. I don't think that the core Sugar Labs bugsquad should be testing Activities. I also don't think that internal OLPC QA should be testing Activities, other than making sure the ones we ship are ship-quality on XOs (by coordinating with the individual Activity projects, ideally). |
| | | |
− | ** Making Activities platform-independent
| + | * Making Activities platform-independent |
− | *** The question of "who tests Activities?" is somewhat related to the issue of making activities platform independent, similarly to firefox plugins (I will elaborate on it in the meeting). [[User:Marcopg]]
| + | ** The question of "who tests Activities?" is somewhat related to the issue of making activities platform independent, similarly to firefox plugins (I will elaborate on it in the meeting). [[User:Marcopg]] |
| | | |
| ** If we move activities testing upstream, how do we move tickets? If we don't move them, where should user oriented information be hosted? | | ** If we move activities testing upstream, how do we move tickets? If we don't move them, where should user oriented information be hosted? |