5,705
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 12:
Line 12: + +
Talk:Features/Server Objects Sharing (view source)
Revision as of 18:23, 21 July 2009
, 18:23, 21 July 2009no edit summary
I think that Moodle might have a lead in this aspect because it is more easily available on the XS images. Installing ASLO/AMO is quite a bit complicated but the XS comes with a ready-to-run Moodle instance, AFAIK. [[User:Tomeu|Tomeu]] 16:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I think that Moodle might have a lead in this aspect because it is more easily available on the XS images. Installing ASLO/AMO is quite a bit complicated but the XS comes with a ready-to-run Moodle instance, AFAIK. [[User:Tomeu|Tomeu]] 16:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
* in common case, yes(e.g. in case of local storage for class/school/region) but this particular proposal is about central place like ASLO for activities(at least it was); we already(in SL) have several not trivial to support services(wiki, track, ASLO etc.), so adding library.sl.o won't be a huge problem; imho from usability pov, I don't see any differences between wiki and moodle - they lose a game for special services like AMO and [http://scratch.mit.edu/] when user need only place to brose/download/upload objects.