Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| ==Origin== | | ==Origin== |
| | | |
− | A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision. | + | A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision. |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 63: |
Line 63: |
| | | |
| The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below: | | The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions. The Decision Panel's answers are below: |
| + | |
| | | |
| Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" | | Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" |
| | | |
− | Answer: Yes. | + | Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans. |
| + | |
| | | |
| Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" | | Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" |
| | | |
| Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. | | Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. |
| + | |
| | | |
| Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" | | Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" |
| | | |
| Answer: Yes. | | Answer: Yes. |
| + | |
| | | |
| In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" (Question 0). | | In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" (Question 0). |
Line 116: |
Line 120: |
| Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" | | Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" |
| | | |
− | Answer: Yes. | + | Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans. |
| | | |
| | | |
Line 147: |
Line 151: |
| | | |
| =====Question 1===== | | =====Question 1===== |
| + | |
| + | Yes: |
| + | |
| + | # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly] |
| + | # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead] |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | No: |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Undecided: |
| + | |
| + | # Martin Dengler |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Unknown: |
| + | |
| + | # Sebastian Dziallas |
| + | # Luke Faraone |
| + | # Faisal Khan |
| + | # Benjamin M. Schwartz |
| + | # Samuel Klein |
| + | # Tabitha Roder |
| + | # Caryl Bigenho |
| + | # Daniel Drake |
| + | # Abhishek Indoria |
| + | |
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
| =====Question 2===== | | =====Question 2===== |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Yes: |
| + | |
| + | # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler] |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | No: |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Undecided: |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Unknown: |
| + | # Sebastian Dziallas |
| + | # Luke Faraone |
| + | # Martin Dengler |
| + | # Bill Bogstad |
| + | # Faisal Khan |
| + | # Benjamin M. Schwartz |
| + | # Samuel Klein |
| + | # Tabitha Roder |
| + | # Caryl Bigenho |
| + | # Daniel Drake |
| + | # Abhishek Indoria |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | |
| | | |
| | | |
| =====Question 3===== | | =====Question 3===== |
| + | |
| + | Yes: |
| + | |
| + | # [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly] |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | No: |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Undecided: |
| + | # Martin Dengler (dependent on answer to question #1) |
| + | # Bill Bogstad (dependent on answer to question #1) |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | Unknown: |
| + | # Sebastian Dziallas |
| + | # Luke Faraone |
| + | # Faisal Khan |
| + | # Benjamin M. Schwartz |
| + | # Samuel Klein |
| + | # Tabitha Roder |
| + | # Caryl Bigenho |
| + | # Daniel Drake |
| + | # Abhishek Indoria |
| | | |
| | | |