Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,509 bytes added ,  23:45, 5 October 2009
initial content for votes / recorded opinions section
Line 3: Line 3:  
==Origin==
 
==Origin==
   −
A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.
+
A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September, 2009]] Oversight Board decision.
      Line 63: Line 63:     
The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions.  The Decision Panel's answers are below:
 
The Decision Panel was [[#Mandate|mandated]] to answer three questions.  The Decision Panel's answers are below:
 +
    
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
 
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
   −
Answer: Yes.
+
Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.
 +
 
    
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
 
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
    
Answer: No.  Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
 
Answer: No.  Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
 +
    
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"  
 
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"  
    
Answer: Yes.
 
Answer: Yes.
 +
    
In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" (Question 0).
 
In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" (Question 0).
Line 116: Line 120:  
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
 
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
   −
Answer: Yes.
+
Answer: No, not now. SL is not now a full-service GNU/Linux distributor but 1) many contributors volunteer to help with individual tasks thereof; and 2) an official plan is part of a number of SugarLabs' members plans.
      Line 147: Line 151:     
=====Question 1=====
 
=====Question 1=====
 +
 +
Yes:
 +
 +
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-October/000100.html Sean Daly]
 +
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000029.html Bill Bogstead]
 +
 +
 +
No:
 +
 +
 +
 +
Undecided:
 +
 +
# Martin Dengler
 +
 +
 +
Unknown:
 +
 +
# Sebastian Dziallas
 +
# Luke Faraone
 +
# Faisal Khan
 +
# Benjamin M. Schwartz
 +
# Samuel Klein
 +
# Tabitha Roder
 +
# Caryl Bigenho
 +
# Daniel Drake
 +
# Abhishek Indoria
 +
 +
       
=====Question 2=====
 
=====Question 2=====
 +
 +
 +
Yes:
 +
 +
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000028.html Martin Dengler]
 +
 +
 +
No:
 +
 +
 +
Undecided:
 +
 +
 +
Unknown:
 +
# Sebastian Dziallas
 +
# Luke Faraone
 +
# Martin Dengler
 +
# Bill Bogstad
 +
# Faisal Khan
 +
# Benjamin M. Schwartz
 +
# Samuel Klein
 +
# Tabitha Roder
 +
# Caryl Bigenho
 +
# Daniel Drake
 +
# Abhishek Indoria
 +
 +
 +
       
=====Question 3=====
 
=====Question 3=====
 +
 +
Yes:
 +
 +
# [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/soas/2009-September/000045.html Sean Daly]
 +
 +
 +
No:
 +
 +
 +
Undecided:
 +
# Martin Dengler  (dependent on answer to question #1)
 +
# Bill Bogstad  (dependent on answer to question #1)
 +
 +
 +
Unknown:
 +
# Sebastian Dziallas
 +
# Luke Faraone
 +
# Faisal Khan
 +
# Benjamin M. Schwartz
 +
# Samuel Klein
 +
# Tabitha Roder
 +
# Caryl Bigenho
 +
# Daniel Drake
 +
# Abhishek Indoria
     
243

edits

Navigation menu