243
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 75:
Line 75: − + − {|+ − !Yes − !No − |- − | − − − # No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution. − |} − Answer: TBD − + − {|+ − !Yes − !No − − | − # Yes. − | − # − |} − Answer: TBD Line 156:
Line 138: + Line 162:
Line 145: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 170:
Line 166: − + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
add stubs for question 2 and 3 opinion surveys
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
Answer:
Answer: [[#Question_2|TBD - see below for opinions]]
#
|
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
Answer: Yes.
Answer: [[#Question_3|TBD - see below for opinions]]
|-
In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" (Question 0).
In addition, [[#Mandate|the mandate]] allows the Decision Panel to raise and answer any other question the DP deems required to provide an answer to the original question: "Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" (Question 0).
# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
|}
|}
====Question 2====
====Question 2====
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
Answer: No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
Answer:
{|
!Yes
!No
!Invalid
|-
|
#
|
# No. Sugar On a Stick, the Fedora-derived distribution, will be the endorsed distribution.
|
# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
|}
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
Answer: Yes.
Answer:
{|
!Yes
!No
!Invalid
|-
|
# Yes.
|
#
|
# Invalid question. An answer to this question is not needed for Sugar Labs' members to get on with their work, and the results from a decision panel will not have any effect [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2009-September/008751.html ref].
|}