130
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 120:
Line 120: − Answer:+ − Line 146:
Line 145: − Answer:+ + Line 169:
Line 169: − Answer: + −
→Report on Questions 1-3: prpoed answers
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
'''Proposed answers:'''
{| border="1"
{| border="1"
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
'''Proposed answers:'''
{| border="1"
{| border="1"
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
'''Proposed answers:'''
{| border="1"
{| border="1"