Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | {{draft}}
| |
− |
| |
| {{TOCright2|limit=2}} | | {{TOCright2|limit=2}} |
| | | |
− | ==Origin== | + | ==Overview== |
| | | |
| A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision. | | A 12-person Sugar-on-a-Stick (SoaS) decision panel was appointed by a [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-09-25#Decision_Panel|September 25, 2009]] Oversight Board decision. |
| + | |
| + | The Oversight Board requested a final report, but none was received [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|by 2009-12-04]]. The Oversight Board then assumed responsibility for deciding the mandated questions (ibid.). A summary [[#Conclusion|is below]]. |
| | | |
| ==Mandate== | | ==Mandate== |
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| {{quote| | | {{quote| |
| :"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: | | :"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following: |
− | :* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" | + | :* <nowiki>[Question 1]</nowiki> "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" |
− | :* "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" | + | :* <nowiki>[Question 2]</nowiki> "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" |
− | :* "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" | + | :* <nowiki>[Question 3]</nowiki> "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" |
| :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" | | :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" |
| }} | | }} |
Line 45: |
Line 45: |
| | | |
| {{:Decision panels/SOAS/Report}} | | {{:Decision panels/SOAS/Report}} |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | == Conclusion == |
| + | |
| + | In the [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|absence]] of a final report the Oversight board decided [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|Question 1,]] [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Revisit_Motion_4_from_last_week|Question 2,]] and [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29||Question 3]]: |
| + | |
| + | {{quote| |
| + | :* <nowiki>[Question 1]</nowiki> "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?" |
| + | :** Answer: [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|No]]. |
| + | :* <nowiki>[Question 2]</nowiki> "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?" |
| + | :** Answer: [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Revisit_Motion_4_from_last_week|No.]] SL may promote one distribution in its marketing campaign, but encourages all GNU/Linux distributions to package and distribute Sugar, and if possible will assist with hosting and infrastructure. |
| + | :* <nowiki>[Question 3]</nowiki> "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?" |
| + | :** Answer: [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-18#Resolve_outstanding_Sugar_on_a_Stick_decision_.28Q3.29|Yes.]] |
| + | :* Any other question the Decision Panel deems required to provide an answer to the original question:"Is the current SoaS going to be the primary way Sugar Labs distributes a Sugar-centric GNU/Linux distribution?" |
| + | :** Answer: [[Oversight_Board/Meeting_Minutes-2009-12-11#SoaS_DP|Sugar Labs' intent to promote Sugar as widely as possible]] means that SL will work with GNU/Linux distros to produce and offer downloadable versions. This work can include helping to promote distros, and hosting them. |
| + | }} |
| + | |
| | | |
| ==Further ideas== | | ==Further ideas== |