Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 120: Line 120:  
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
 
Question 1: "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"
   −
Answer:
+
'''Proposed answers:'''
 
      
{| border="1"
 
{| border="1"
Line 146: Line 145:  
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
 
Question 2: "Should SL be neutral about distributions containing Sugar, and refuse to endorse one over another?"
   −
Answer:
+
'''Proposed answers:'''
 +
 
    
{| border="1"
 
{| border="1"
Line 169: Line 169:  
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
 
Question 3: "Should 'Sugar on a Stick' be a phrase that SL asks its community to avoid using unless they refer to the SoaS-Fedora distribution?"
   −
Answer:  
+
'''Proposed answers:'''
 
      
{| border="1"
 
{| border="1"
130

edits

Navigation menu