User contributions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
- 21:29, 7 March 2012 diff hist -155 Sweets Distribution browse_129-6.1 had the problem, browse_129-7.1 fixed the problem
- 21:13, 7 March 2012 diff hist +60 Sweets Distribution →Ubuntu and its derivates
- 21:12, 7 March 2012 diff hist +193 Ubuntu/Tests
- 21:07, 7 March 2012 diff hist +55 Sweets Distribution →Sweets Distribution 0.94
- 20:57, 7 March 2012 diff hist +128 Sweets Distribution →Ubuntu and its derivates
- 20:55, 7 March 2012 diff hist +218 Ubuntu/Tests →Ubuntu 11.10 with Sugar 0.94
- 20:49, 7 March 2012 diff hist +22 Sweets Distribution →Sweets Distribution 0.94
- 20:47, 7 March 2012 diff hist +54 Sweets Distribution →Sweets Distribution 0.94
- 20:45, 7 March 2012 diff hist -15 Ubuntu/Tests →Ubuntu 11.10 with Sugar 0.94
- 20:42, 7 March 2012 diff hist +89 N Compound commands Created page with "A compound command is a list of commands that are tied together so that they work as one."
- 20:39, 7 March 2012 diff hist -366 Sweets Distribution packages for 0.94/11.04 are fixed, this problem no longer occurs
- 20:36, 7 March 2012 diff hist +24 Sweets Distribution →Sweets Distribution 0.94
- 20:34, 7 March 2012 diff hist +500 Sweets Distribution →Ubuntu and its derivates
- 20:27, 7 March 2012 diff hist -76 Sweets Distribution tested sweets distribution on 11.10
- 03:27, 7 March 2012 diff hist -1,674 Talk:Sweets Distribution remove old page content that was not discussion about page content.
- 03:21, 7 March 2012 diff hist +209 Ubuntu/0.90 avoid duplicating the installation instructions yet again, in a different form
- 03:13, 7 March 2012 diff hist +13 Ubuntu/0.90
- 02:16, 7 March 2012 diff hist -30 Ubuntu/Tests review and reformat for readability
- 02:04, 7 March 2012 diff hist 0 Sweets Distribution
- 02:02, 7 March 2012 diff hist +7 Sweets Distribution →Sweets Distribution 0.94
- 02:01, 7 March 2012 diff hist +50 N Community/Distributions/Ubuntu-Tests moved Community/Distributions/Ubuntu-Tests to Community/Distributions/Ubuntu/Tests: this page was not a distribution called "ubuntu-tests", but rather tests of a distribution called "ubuntu"
- 02:01, 7 March 2012 diff hist 0 m Ubuntu/Tests moved Community/Distributions/Ubuntu-Tests to Community/Distributions/Ubuntu/Tests: this page was not a distribution called "ubuntu-tests", but rather tests of a distribution called "ubuntu"
- 01:57, 7 March 2012 diff hist +2 Sweets Distribution →Ubuntu and its derivates
- 01:52, 7 March 2012 diff hist +257 Sweets Distribution →Ubuntu and its derivates
- 23:22, 5 March 2012 diff hist -162 Ubuntu/0.90 remvoed the suggestion to install sugar-session-0.90, as it doesn't actually work, tested on 12.04 and 11.04.
- 23:18, 5 March 2012 diff hist -10 Ubuntu/0.90 →Workaround for Sugar 0.90 on 11.04.4 Ubuntu
- 23:17, 5 March 2012 diff hist -1 Ubuntu/0.90 remove extra blank line
- 23:16, 5 March 2012 diff hist +106 Ubuntu/0.90 expand on the problem description and use correct terms, my settings not control panel.
- 22:49, 5 March 2012 diff hist +286 Ubuntu/Previous add ubuntu 12.04 beta1 results
- 22:27, 5 March 2012 diff hist -6 Sweets Distribution while i agree it is indeed possible to do what was highlighted, i don't think the example needs to be highlighted, as it draws attention away from the rest of the text; the eye is drawn to the bolding
- 21:38, 5 March 2012 diff hist +422 Ubuntu/Previous test result, not reproducible
- 21:31, 5 March 2012 diff hist -2,726 Talk:Ubuntu move text to subject specific page, it wasn't talk.
- 21:30, 5 March 2012 diff hist -246 Ubuntu improve the english flow of the "no compatible web browser" paragraph, and move the prior version text from the talk page to a page of its own
- 21:25, 5 March 2012 diff hist +2,794 N Ubuntu/Previous copied from talk page
- 01:23, 5 March 2012 diff hist -30 Ubuntu
- 01:20, 5 March 2012 diff hist +4 Ubuntu →Installation
- 01:20, 5 March 2012 diff hist +752 Ubuntu
- 01:12, 5 March 2012 diff hist 0 Ubuntu/0.90 →Problem: unexpected dialog
- 01:11, 5 March 2012 diff hist +83 Ubuntu/0.90 →Problem: unexpected dialog
- 01:02, 5 March 2012 diff hist +22 Ubuntu →Installation
- 01:01, 5 March 2012 diff hist -3 Ubuntu →How to install Sugar on Ubuntu
- 00:59, 5 March 2012 diff hist -1,369 Ubuntu remove unnecessary complexity; we should not be suggesting such an extensive list of broken versions, and this isn't the place for test reports.
- 00:48, 5 March 2012 diff hist +4 Ubuntu there is no such thing as ubuntu 10.40.4
- 00:47, 5 March 2012 diff hist -134 Ubuntu it isn't our place to say when ubuntu withdraws update support for their core operating system, and we should not imply that sugar is supported in the same way.
- 00:45, 5 March 2012 diff hist -31 Ubuntu the ubuntu icon adds no value and is distracting
- 00:44, 5 March 2012 diff hist -104 Ubuntu fix wording of intro
- 00:40, 5 March 2012 diff hist -51 Ubuntu be rid of the repetitive mention of full screen emulator icon changes
- 00:36, 5 March 2012 diff hist 0 Fedora →Sugar Learning Environment packaged in F14 or F15
- 00:35, 5 March 2012 diff hist +2 Fedora →Sugar Learning Environment packaged in F14 or F15
- 00:35, 5 March 2012 diff hist -384 Fedora →Sugar Learning Environment packaged in F14 or F15