Page history
8 October 2009
→Question 2: flip-flop on further reflection
-1
→Votes / Recorded opinions: update self
-2
→Question 2: fix link
m-1
→Question 3: fix url link
m-1
→Report on Questions 1-3: add more points/counterpoints and sumamries
+930
→Question 2: add undecided column
+469
add "undecided" column to question 1
+272
→Executive Summary: remove "draft" heading as the whole page has the draft template and each answer is clearly labeled as a draft, too
-86
add borders to stub question-opinion tables
m+22
add stubs for question 2 and 3 opinion surveys
+492
move Question 1 opinions out of executive summary
-170
→Executive Summary: correct reference
m-1
→Executive Summary: whitespace
m-1
add draft banner; add views on Question 1
+1,718
Undo revision 38949 by Sj (Talk)
+108
whitespace
m-1
"this is a draft" was already in the "Report" section, so just changed its formatting to what SJ put in
-21
draft.
+68
unresolved.
-108
7 October 2009
→Question 3: remove dupe of abishek indoria in undecided section
m-19
→Question 3: remove (very wide) qualification for Bill Bogstad's "undecided" - I could qualify others' but it'd still be me putting words into their mouths
m-39
set all borders to 1
mplay with borders
m+33
reformat voting results as wiki tables
+477
6 October 2009
→Potential naming conventions
+263
→Question 2
-1
→Question 1
-1
→Question 3
-2
→Question 2
-15
→Question 2
+15
→Question 2
m→Question 1
m-1
→Question 1
m-3
→Question 3
m-3
→Question 2
m-5
update Martin Dengler opinions
+99
add abishek indoria's opinions
+220
→Origin: date was missing from link to SLOB email
+2
initial content for votes / recorded opinions section
+1,509
correct mandate link, add TOCright2
+22
add report section and re-structure page
+2,569
3 October 2009
30 September 2009
→Process: discussion to happen on soas@
+79
no edit summary
m+24
→Process
m+185
no edit summary
m+5
→Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?
m+3
no edit summary
m+567