10,505
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Line 23:
Line 53: − + + Line 41:
Line 72: − +
Oversight Board/Decisions (view source)
Revision as of 18:52, 6 October 2017
, 18:52, 6 October 2017→2017-09-20
We welcome non-member proposals at the time of a meeting; but they require both a proposer and seconder from among the members of the board. Several proposals that were not taken as motions are shown here struck out, as in <s>MEMBER MOTION</s>.
We welcome non-member proposals at the time of a meeting; but they require both a proposer and seconder from among the members of the board. Several proposals that were not taken as motions are shown here struck out, as in <s>MEMBER MOTION</s>.
==2017-10-06==
;AGREED MOTION 2017-18 Proposed by Walter Bender, seconded by Samson Goddy
Motion: Approval for contracting Edgar [Quispe] to do $500 worth of translation in support of changes in Sugar and Sugar activities related to the 0.112 Release (approximately 500 words).
<br>4 in favor, 2 abstain, 1 absent (See [http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/sugar-meeting/meetings/2017-10-06T19:00:31]);
==2017-09-20==
;AGREED MOTION 2017-17 Proposed by Walter Bender, seconded by Sameer Verma
Motion: Approve a travel advance for US $2550 (US $2000 SFC prepurchase of an airline ticket and $550 towards local transport) for Samson Goddy's travel to the Google Summer of Code mentor's summit.
<br>5 in favor, 1 recuse, 1 vote yet to be counted [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020184.html]
==2017-09-16==
;FAILED MOTION 2017-16 Proposed by Laura Vargas, not seconded
Motion: To appoint Sugar Labs Oversight Board member Laura Vargas as Sugar Labs Financial Manager with a monthly stipend of US$ 200 in accordance with AGREED MOTION 2017-13.
==2017-09-15==
;AGREED MOTION 2017-16 Proposed by Walter Bender, seconded by Samson Goddy
Motion: To answer the questions posed by the SFC regarding the xo-computer icon as follows:
:(Q1) Why is the XO logo included in the sugar-artwork repo now -- and does the SLOBs want to keep it there?
:(A1) The xo-computer icon has been part of Sugar since we first designed and built Sugar (beginning in 2006) and we would like to keep it there until such time as the design team decides there is a reason to change it.
:(Q2) Assuming the SLOBs want to keep the XO logo in sugar-artwork: what outcome would the SLOBs *prefer* to see happen? E.g.,
:- Does Sugar want downstream users to be able to redistribute and modify Sugar's codebase with or without the XO trademark file included in the program?
:- Does the SLOBs want downstream users to be able to modify and redistribute the XO trademark image itself, or is that less important to Sugar?
:(A2) Sugar Artwork, including the xo-computer icon, is currently licensed under the GPL and we would like our downstream users to be able to use all of our artwork under the terms of that license. As far as the use of any trademark image outside of the context of Sugar, we have no opinion.<br>
(5 in favor, 1 opposed, 1 vote not cast) See [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2017-September/054709.html]
==2017-09-14==
;AGREED MOTION 2017-15 Proposed by Laura Vargas, seconded by Samson Goddy
Motion: Sugar Labs to participate in GCI 2017.
(6 in favor) [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020111.html 1] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020113.html 2] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020114.html 3] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020115.html 4] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020119.html 5] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020121.html 6]
==2017-09-05==
==2017-09-05==
;FAILED MOTION 2017-12 Proposed by Walter Bender, seconded by Samson Goddy: Motion: Samson Goddy has been selected as a Sugar Labs representative to the Google Summer of Code mentor summit. He has requested a travel advance to cover the costs of his visa application. The advance, including wire fees comes to $US 627.05. This motion is to approve the travel advance. (As additional background, Google will be covering up to $2200 in travel expenses for two representatives to attend the summit. Since our other representative is local to the SF area, the bulk of that money would be available to cover Samson's travel, so the net impact on SL funds will be negligible.<br>
;FAILED MOTION 2017-12 Proposed by Walter Bender, seconded by Samson Goddy: Motion: Samson Goddy has been selected as a Sugar Labs representative to the Google Summer of Code mentor summit. He has requested a travel advance to cover the costs of his visa application. The advance, including wire fees comes to $US 627.05. This motion is to approve the travel advance. (As additional background, Google will be covering up to $2200 in travel expenses for two representatives to attend the summit. Since our other representative is local to the SF area, the bulk of that money would be available to cover Samson's travel, so the net impact on SL funds will be negligible.<br>
(3 in favor, 2 opposed, 2 abstain).
(3 in favor, 2 opposed, 2 abstain).
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-August/019979.html 1][http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-August/019977.html 2]
[http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-August/019982.html 3]
==2017-06-20==
==2017-06-20==
== 2017-04-21 ==
== 2017-04-21 ==
;FAILED MOTION 2017-06 Laura Vargas, seconded by Lionel Laske: Urgent maintenance budget of 500$ for fixing spam attacks on Sugar Network. Detail of the tasks to do are described in the Technical Service Request provided by Laura. It's an one shot motion to avoid interruption of service for Sugar Network users. Further investments on Sugar Network will be correlated to discussion about long-term support of the platform.<br>(3 votes for, 1 vote against, 1 recuse, 1 abstain and 1 member absent)
;AGREED MOTION 2017-06 Lionel Lake, seconded by Samson Goddy: Urgent maintenance budget of 500$ for fixing spam attacks on Sugar Network. Detail of the tasks to do are described in the Technical Service Request provided by Laura. It's an one shot motion to avoid interruption of service for Sugar Network users. Further investments on Sugar Network will be correlated to discussion about long-term support of the platform.<br>(4 votes for [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-September/020257.html Sameer] [http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-April/019611.html Samson], [https://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-April/019610.html Lionel], [https://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2017-April/019620.html Ignacio])
== 2017-04-07 ==
== 2017-04-07 ==