Difference between revisions of "Education Team/Survey questions"
Tonyforster (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
jt4sugar: Ask the teachers in Uraguay to tell us how they would get other teachers involved | jt4sugar: Ask the teachers in Uraguay to tell us how they would get other teachers involved | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
| + | |||
In questions, we should try to separate the concepts of | In questions, we should try to separate the concepts of | ||
* access to computers, | * access to computers, | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
- Tony <br> | - Tony <br> | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | We should get feedback on the Journal, View Source, and Collaboration... | ||
Revision as of 08:15, 7 March 2009
Please add your questions for teachers here:
jt4sugar: Ask the teachers in Uraguay to tell us how they would get other teachers involved
In questions, we should try to separate the concepts of
- access to computers,
- electronic content,
- the specific features of the XO hardware,
- the operating system Sugar,
- the Activities, and
- internet access.
Thoughts on the OLPC five core principles—
- Child Ownership,
- Low Ages,
- Saturation,
- Connection, and
- Free and Open Source.
How important are they in the context of your community?
The OLPC can be customised for the local language. How far has this proceeded? How important is it? What are the problems? What are the perspectives of different stakeholder groups?
How can ICT in general and Sugar in particular be appropriated to meet local needs? Are there any anecdotes of appropriation?
How might ICT education in general and Sugar in particular change relationships between people in your country, for example gender access to technology, relationships between children and adults, urban and village? How might kinship relationships be enhanced or weakened?
- Tony
We should get feedback on the Journal, View Source, and Collaboration...