Difference between revisions of "Talk:Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Talk:DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap/0.84 moved to Talk:Development Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84: deCamel casing) |
m (fix camelcase links) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This list looks like features not goals to me. <br> | This list looks like features not goals to me. <br> | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Collaboration scalability|Collaboration scalability]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Responsive UI|Responsive UI]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Stable activities API|Stable activities API]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Sugar everywhere|Sugar everywhere]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Compatibility|Compatibility]] with desktop applications |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Quality|Quality]] and reliability |
My suggestion for goals in this release are: | My suggestion for goals in this release are: | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* '''Greater Reliability and Performance''' <br> | * '''Greater Reliability and Performance''' <br> | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Responsive UI|Responsive UI]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Stable activities API|Stable activities API]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Quality|Quality]] and reliability |
* '''Easier to Deploy and Maintain''' <br> | * '''Easier to Deploy and Maintain''' <br> | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* '''Collaboration''' <br> | * '''Collaboration''' <br> | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Collaboration scalability|Collaboration scalability]] |
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
# Make an exception by defining the user benefit of these and showing demand. | # Make an exception by defining the user benefit of these and showing demand. | ||
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Next generation journal|Next generation journal]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Shell improvements|Shell improvements]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Sugar everywhere|Sugar everywhere]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Compatibility|Compatibility]] with desktop applications |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Clipboard|Robust Clipboard]] |
− | * [[ | + | * [[Development Team/0.84/Activities|Make activities rock!]] |
BTW I hope you don't mind these comments as edits to your page. Back them off and copy to the discussion page if you prefer or let me know how to submit my suggestions. Thanks [[User:Gregorio|Gregorio]] 16:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | BTW I hope you don't mind these comments as edits to your page. Back them off and copy to the discussion page if you prefer or let me know how to submit my suggestions. Thanks [[User:Gregorio|Gregorio]] 16:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:46, 8 April 2009
This list looks like features not goals to me.
- Collaboration scalability
- Responsive UI
- Stable activities API
- Sugar everywhere
- Compatibility with desktop applications
- Quality and reliability
My suggestion for goals in this release are:
- Greater Reliability and Performance
- Easier to Deploy and Maintain
- Collaboration
From http://wiki.laptop.org/go/9.1.0#Technical_Strategy
I group your list of features in to those goals as follows
- Greater Reliability and Performance
- Responsive UI
- Stable activities API
- Quality and reliability
- Easier to Deploy and Maintain
None
- Collaboration
- Collaboration scalability
The following don't seem to fit the goals of 9.1 (and 8.4?) release. For these I suggest we choose one of the following:
- Find a place in the overall goals
- Create new overall goals and fit them in
- Don't work on these
- Make an exception by defining the user benefit of these and showing demand.
- Next generation journal
- Shell improvements
- Sugar everywhere
- Compatibility with desktop applications
- Robust Clipboard
- Make activities rock!
BTW I hope you don't mind these comments as edits to your page. Back them off and copy to the discussion page if you prefer or let me know how to submit my suggestions. Thanks Gregorio 16:33, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Good suggestions Gregorio, thanks a lot. I'll try to refactor things taking them in account. When that's done, I'd appreciate another review.
--Marco