Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"
< Activity Library | Editors | Policy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all). * inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content * no…') |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all). | Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all). | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Content === | ||
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content | * inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content | ||
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change | * non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change | ||
* .. | * .. |
Revision as of 18:49, 29 November 2009
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
Content
- inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
- non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
- ..