Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all). * inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content * no…')
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
 
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
 +
 +
=== Content ===
  
 
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
 
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
 
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
 
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
 
* ..
 
* ..

Revision as of 18:49, 29 November 2009

Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).

Content

  • inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
  • non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
  • ..