Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
=== Reasons for retain in sandbox ===
 
=== Reasons for retain in sandbox ===
  
* lack of educational value<br>'''A''': add such value :)
+
* lack of educational value<br>arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator<br>'''A''': add such value :)
 
* any confusion with already existed activities<br>'''A''': make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc.
 
* any confusion with already existed activities<br>'''A''': make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc.
 
* ...
 
* ...

Revision as of 20:50, 29 November 2009

Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).

Reasons for removing

  • inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
  • non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for

other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change

  • ...

Reasons for retain in sandbox

  • lack of educational value
    arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator
    A: add such value :)
  • any confusion with already existed activities
    A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc.
  • ...