Difference between revisions of "Oversight Board/2009/Meeting Minutes-2009-12-11"
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
=== SoaS DP === | === SoaS DP === | ||
| − | We praised the work done by the SoaS DP even though they did not submit a final report to the oversight board by its deadline. We discussed Q1 and Q2. (Q3 will be discussed at the next meeting.) | + | We praised the work done by the SoaS DP even though they did not submit a final report to the oversight board by its deadline. We discussed [[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q1:_OS_distributor_v._upstream|Q1]] and [[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q2:_distro_endorsement_v._neutrality|Q2]]. ([[Decision_panels/SOAS#Q3:_SoaS_name|Q3]] will be discussed at the next meeting.) |
'''MOTION 2:''' Question 1: Yes, SL is and should be a GNU/Linux distributor. | '''MOTION 2:''' Question 1: Yes, SL is and should be a GNU/Linux distributor. | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 11 December 2009
In attendance:
SLOB members: walter, tomeu, cjb. SeanDaly, mchua, Canoeberry, bernie
Some community members (including alsroot) attended the meeting.
Agenda
- Non-FOSS content
- SoaS DP
- Trademark policy
Non-FOSS content
MOTION 1: adopt http://opensource.org/docs/osd as a set of guidelines for what is permitted on ASLO, for both software and content, and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses's opinions on specific licenses where applicable, and always asking the SFC for advice when a particular license is under question.
Motion passes (6 for; 0 against; 1 abstain)
ACTION: Walter will inform the community
ACTION: Alsroot will update ASLO policy pages
SoaS DP
We praised the work done by the SoaS DP even though they did not submit a final report to the oversight board by its deadline. We discussed Q1 and Q2. (Q3 will be discussed at the next meeting.)
MOTION 2: Question 1: Yes, SL is and should be a GNU/Linux distributor.
Motion failed (3 for; 3 against; 1 abstain)
MOTION 3: SL wishes to spread the use of Sugar and consequently works with GNU/Linux distros to produce and offer downloadable versions. This work can include helping to promote distros, and hosting them.
Motion passed (6 for; 0 against; 1 abstain)
MOTION 4: "Question 2: SL should not be completely neutral about promoting distros, but it should only choose to more strongly promote a distro based on technical merit and maintainer activity, and should publish the criteria it uses for making that decision. Furthermore, SL should be neutral about providing infrastructure resources (hosting, etc) to distros."
Motion passed (4 for; 1 against; 1 abstain; 1 vote yet to be counted)
An amendment to Motion 4 has been proposed and will be discussed at the next meeting.
Trademark policy
To be continued next time.
Next meeting
Friday, 18 December 2009 15:00 UTC