Talk:Infrastructure Team: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC) | :Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --[[User:Morgs|Morgs]] 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.<br/> | |||
Re blog.sugarlabs.org, isn't this obsolesced by planet.sugarlabs.org? --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 12:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:27, 10 November 2008
Not fully convinced about src. I'd rather use a non abbreviated form but... Sources can refer also to source tarballs, maybe it would be better to use something less ambiguous like git or gitorious. --Marcopg
- Yes, from a distro packaging perspective I'd rather see src.s.o go to the place you download tarballs, so I vote for git.s.o too. --Morgs 12:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Re www.sugarlabs.org, we have a splash page designed by Christian Schmidt. We should install it.
Re blog.sugarlabs.org, isn't this obsolesced by planet.sugarlabs.org? --Walter 12:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)