Difference between revisions of "Talk:Features/Terminal Sharing"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Feature Acceptance: new section)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Hi Benjamin,
 
Hi Benjamin,
  
what would be the downside of packing the needed packages inside the activity? I guess one criteria for adding to the platform is: is this worthy for several activities?
+
what would be the downside of packing the needed packages inside the activity? I guess one criteria for adding to the platform is: is this worthy for several activities? -[[User:Erikos|Simon Schampijer]] 04 August 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:02, 4 August 2009

This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -Eben 02:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Feature Acceptance

Hi Benjamin,

what would be the downside of packing the needed packages inside the activity? I guess one criteria for adding to the platform is: is this worthy for several activities? -Simon Schampijer 04 August 2009 (UTC)