Talk:Sugar Labs/Members/List: Difference between revisions
New page: A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to]... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". [[User:Sj|+sj]] [[User Talk:Sj|<font color="#ff6996">+</font>]] 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
:From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented. --[[User:Walter|Walter]] 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:09, 3 July 2008
A drafty description of "who are members" would be helpful - nothing so formal as a set of criteria, just a basic discussion; and a sense of "if you are like this, you may [ask to/want to] be a member of sugarlabs". +sj + 23:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
- From my email: "The criteria I used was in regard to activity on the Sugar and Education mailing lists, contribution to the codebase and to the wiki (and other forms of documentation). I hope to broaden the reach of Sugar Labs membership to include more educators--they are underrepresented. --Walter 02:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)