Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (initial content) |
m (fix camel case) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== Resources === | === Resources === | ||
* [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Applying|How to become an editor]] | * [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Applying|How to become an editor]] | ||
| − | * [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/ | + | * [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Reviewing Guide|Processing the add-on and review queues]] |
* [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Testing|Testing add-ons]] | * [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Testing|Testing add-ons]] | ||
* [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Notes|Random notes]] | * [[Activity_Team/aslo/Editors/Notes|Random notes]] | ||
Revision as of 19:47, 17 March 2009
Introduction
ASLO leverages volunteer reviewers/editors to look over pending and nominated add-ons for publication on the site. With the launch of ASLO and the sandbox, aspects of this role have changed significantly.
In ASLO, anyone is considered a reviewer. Users can install activities as soon as the author submits them. We hope that these users will then return to write a review of their experience with the activity, whether it be good or bad.
What's an editor?
Editors have access to the queue of pending and nominated activities, and their main role is to assess the existing reviews and determine whether the activity should be pushed to the public side based on criteria in the policy.