Talk:File Sharing Utility: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→good, but needs detail: new section |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I will appreciate any kind of queries/recommendation on my application. | I will appreciate any kind of queries/recommendation on my application. | ||
== good, but needs detail == | |||
You're more than half way there, but you need to flesh this out a little bit. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 00:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:11, 30 March 2009
Looks pretty good overall. One small question: do you intend to try to integrate glade-based interfaces with existing journal interfaces (non-glade-based)? Homunq 02:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Reply : Thanks Homunq for reviewing it. On thorough research I found out that making glade work on Sugar will be a big project in it self. Therefore sue to fixed schedule of the Gsoc I wont be doing that. I definitely will like to work on such a project though after Gsoc as it will greatly improve development experience on Sugar. PyGTK for now !
Why not try to us Telepathy for the sharing? BryanWB 11:03, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Reply : Thanks BryanWB for spending time to review my application. Telepathy will indeed be used for many purposes. I will be detailing on it in the proposal shortly.
I will appreciate any kind of queries/recommendation on my application.
good, but needs detail
You're more than half way there, but you need to flesh this out a little bit. Homunq 00:11, 31 March 2009 (UTC)