Jump to content

Karma/To-Do: Difference between revisions

From Sugar Labs
ChristophD (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
ChristophD (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
* investigate browser solution for Sugar .xo bundle
* investigate browser solution for Sugar .xo bundle
* ask Roxan re; Firefox Cache directory should be empty - how to do that and re: changes done to Firefox => (2009-07-13: will be done once Roshan returns on July 24)
* ask Roxan re; Firefox Cache directory should be empty - how to do that and re: changes done to Firefox => (2009-07-13: will be done once Roshan returns on July 24)
* define requirements for browser for Sugar .xo bundles


== Felipe ==
== Felipe ==

Revision as of 04:25, 21 July 2009

Bryan

  • clean up main karma repo
  • add getopt.js to karma.js
  • create dummy kindex.html w/ links to examples
  • bundle in a basic browser and functionality to create xo bundles

Christoph

  • investigate licensing questions (list of files declaring the license okay?) => (2009-07-21: contacted Andriani, will also do more research myself)
    • according to dsd we can simply include a LICENSE file in the top-directory and declare on a directory basis which licenses apply (jquery under MIT and GPL, Karma js code under MIT (?) and multimedia assets under CC-BY-SA)
  • investigate browser solution for Sugar .xo bundle
  • ask Roxan re; Firefox Cache directory should be empty - how to do that and re: changes done to Firefox => (2009-07-13: will be done once Roshan returns on July 24)
  • define requirements for browser for Sugar .xo bundles

Felipe

  • Get "Adding Up to 10" working
  • Add i18n to "Adding up to 10"