Difference between revisions of "Talk:Features/Terminal Sharing"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -~~~~')
 
(→‎Feature Acceptance: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -[[User:Eben|Eben]] 02:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 
This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -[[User:Eben|Eben]] 02:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Feature Acceptance ==
 +
 +
Hi Benjamin,
 +
 +
what would be the downside of packing the needed packages inside the activity? I guess one criteria for adding to the platform is: is this worthy for several activities?

Revision as of 06:01, 4 August 2009

This sounds quite fun and useful. Is there a reason this couldn't be integrated with the Terminal activity itself, with these features enabled when the activity is shared? -Eben 02:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Feature Acceptance

Hi Benjamin,

what would be the downside of packing the needed packages inside the activity? I guess one criteria for adding to the platform is: is this worthy for several activities?