Jump to content

Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical: Difference between revisions

From Sugar Labs
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
* ..
* lack of educational value
* ...

Revision as of 18:55, 29 November 2009

Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).

Content

  • inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
  • non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
  • lack of educational value
  • ...