Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all). | Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all). | ||
=== | === Reasons for removing === | ||
* inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content | * inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content | ||
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change | * non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for | ||
other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change | |||
* ... | |||
=== Reasons for retain in sandbox === | |||
* lack of educational value | * lack of educational value | ||
* any confusing with already existed activities | |||
* ... | * ... | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 29 November 2009
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
Reasons for removing
- inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
- non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for
other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
- ...
Reasons for retain in sandbox
- lack of educational value
- any confusing with already existed activities
- ...