Difference between revisions of "Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical"
< Activity Library | Editors | Policy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for | * non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for | ||
other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change | other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change | ||
| + | ** code should conform [http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses FSF GPL compatible list] | ||
| + | ** the rest of content should one of [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ CC] licences | ||
* (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros | * (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros | ||
* ... | * ... | ||
Revision as of 10:31, 11 December 2009
Some points that could be considered during activity review(maybe some of activities should be removed at all).
Reasons for removing
- inappropriate(violent, sexual, subversive content) content
- non-FOSS licence, any restriction for essential(for education, some people think, essential for
other cases too:) behaviour, free to run|study|redistribute|change
- code should conform FSF GPL compatible list
- the rest of content should one of CC licences
- (?) activity is just bundled application which already (well)packaged in various distros
- ...
Reasons for retain in sandbox
- (?) lack of educational value
arguable, it could be something useful for user environment e.g. UsbCreator
A: add such value :) - any confusion with already existed activities
A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description etc. - ...