School Network/Open Build Service/Policy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=== Audit === | === Audit === | ||
Some checks, such as checking software license & conforming to this Policy, will be made automatically while uploading sources to the Open Build Service. In other cases, e.g., inappropriate content, we rely on [[Activity Library]] | Some checks, such as checking software license & conforming to this Policy, will be made automatically while uploading sources to the Open Build Service. In other cases, e.g., inappropriate content, we rely on [[Activity Library/Editors|Activity Library Editors]] and community feedback. |
Revision as of 13:58, 30 October 2011
![]() |
NOTICE: This page is a draft in active flux... Please contribute to these contents and discuss issues on the discussion page. |
This Policy is based on the Activity Library one, assuming that the Sugar Activity Library will provide software hosted on the Open Build System.
Requirements
Software that is not permitted contains:
- Inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content, or
- Inappropriate license.
Licenses should conform Sugar Labs' Licensing policy.
Top level project naming rules:
- Projects with names directly associated with a particular software line can be created only by the software upstream developers.
- Names inherited from the Activity Library have a priority.
Special cases
These cases require special treatment involving all concerned parties:
- Names confusion between top level projects.
The final decision will be made by the Open Build System administration team.
Audit
Some checks, such as checking software license & conforming to this Policy, will be made automatically while uploading sources to the Open Build Service. In other cases, e.g., inappropriate content, we rely on Activity Library Editors and community feedback.