Activity Library/Editors/Policy/Non-Technical

From Sugar Labs
< Activity Library‎ | Editors‎ | Policy
Revision as of 14:04, 6 February 2011 by RafaelOrtiz (talk | contribs) (minor)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Some points that should be considered during activity review, some activities could be removed at all.

Reasons for removing

  • inappropriate (violent, sexual, subversive) content
  • inappropriate license, see Oversight Board meeting notes for details

Reasons for retain in sandbox

  • Any confusion with already-existing activities
    A: make difference more clear, obvious renaming, making notice in description,not launching activity. etc.
    • At the same time we should stimulate experiments, changing existed activities and, which is especially important, sharing results of these experiments. New ASLO code base might support having several implementations("forks" might too hard word for them) of the same activity. Need to think how this can be achieved.
      alsroot 07:32, 25 October 2010 (EDT)
  • Obvious misuse of categories, e.g., FireFox activity in Teaching tools
    A: contact with uploader to clarify categories choice