Difference between revisions of "Activity Team/Obsolete/Zero Sugar Use Cases"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
* user(or distributor), by setting policy, can prefer only packaged versions
 
* user(or distributor), by setting policy, can prefer only packaged versions
 
* user all time can pick up recent version from developer
 
* user all time can pick up recent version from developer
 +
 +
== Per user Sugar on a stick ==
 +
 +
Assuming that most of activities are follow Zero Sugar workflow and activity developers want to support packagers, it is possible to create live DVD/USB images on [http://wiki.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_KIWI|demand]] just by using OBS [https://build.opensuse.org/ web client].

Revision as of 01:32, 30 June 2010



How Zero Sugar could be useful on examples.

Natively packaged or directly from developer activities?

Zero Sugar could help with optimizing developer-to-distributor-to-user model. For example:

  • developer lets 0sugar create packages for major GNU/Linux distribution on OBS
  • distributors, either using native OBS features (like links and branches) create their own compilations of activities on OBS or just attach/copy OBS packages, compose repositories with activities for end users
  • on end users side, sugar will understand that there are packaged and direct activity instances
  • user(or distributor), by setting policy, can prefer only packaged versions
  • user all time can pick up recent version from developer

Per user Sugar on a stick

Assuming that most of activities are follow Zero Sugar workflow and activity developers want to support packagers, it is possible to create live DVD/USB images on [1]] just by using OBS web client.