Archive/Current Events/2011-06-06

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Sugar Digest

1. I am working on a modification of Sugar's View Source mechanism that allows the user to make modifications to copies of the source code. So far, I have it working for Sugar activities. It is quite simple actually: I added a palette button to the existing viewsource.py code (written by Tomeu Vizoso) to make a local copy of the activity being viewed. I rename the copy to MyActivity and change the bundle_id to bundle_id_my_copy.

It is that simple: one mouse click and you have a copy of any activity available to modify while leaving the original activity intact. And you immediately see a working copy of the activity on your Sugar Home View.

As far as making modifications, at present, I am leaving it to the user to open the Terminal activity and make changes using vi or nano. I am considering enabling either Pippy or the Edit activity to open files in ~/Activities or to expose ~/Activities in the Journal in much the way we are considering for ~/Documents. Feedback would be appreciated.

Next up is to do something similar with Sugar itself. I am working on a patch that will provide View Source to Sugar and the Sugar toolkit. (The current version of my patch adds a View Source Button as a menu item under the Journal icon on the Frame.) Once I have this working, adding a copy mechanism, perhaps to ~/site-packages, would be a simple modification. Change sys.path and you are up and running on a locally modifiable version. No root access required!

I have to think through the implications of how the user will switch back and forth between Sugar versions. With activities, since I change the bundle_id, the original and modified versions can coexist. It is not obvious--at least to me--how to have two different versions of Sugar running in parallel. This wouldn't be a problem as long as the user doesn't make a change to Sugar that causes it to crash, but I expect (hope) that will happen frequently. (As Samuel Beckett said: "Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try Again. Fail again. Fail better.") So we need some recovery mechanism that is not dependent on a working Sugar.

2. In the very cool department: Check out Koji Yokokawa's project that enables you to control Scratch from Etoys (See http://www.squeaksource.com/ScratchConnect.html).

In the community

3. The New Zealand Testing Team is expanding: Tabitha Roder and Tom Parker are happy to announce the arrival of Oliver Nathan Erasmus Parker, born 17:38 on 6 May (See pictures at http://carrott.org/gingernut/).

4. The joint GNOME and KDE 2011 Desktop Summit is taking place in Berlin from August 6–12.

Sugar Labs

Gary Martin has generated a SOM from the past few weeks of discussion on the IAEP mailing list.

  • 2011 May 14th–29th (74 emails)

  • 2011 May 7th–13th (75 emails)

Visit our planet [1] for more updates about Sugar and Sugar deployments.

Retrieved from "https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Archive/Current_Events/2011-06-06&oldid=66257"