Difference between revisions of "Talk:Summer of Code/2009/Groupthink"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: OK, well, I'm drunk at the moment, so don't expect a lot of coherence. But the point I want to make is that, you've heard me say it before, I think that the sync/async collaboration, the d...)
 
m (make family friendly)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
OK, well, I'm drunk at the moment, so don't expect a lot of coherence. But the point I want to make is that, you've heard me say it before, I think that the sync/async collaboration, the differential versioned filesytem, and the undo stack, is really the same issue. If you can make a network protocol that does three-way diffs using the same data that is in the versioned filesystem, and keeps XML compliant to the DTD, anyone can use it for any data and they get versioning, collaboration, and undo/redo for free and sugar rules the world. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 06:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
+
But the point I want to make is that, you've heard me say it before, I think that the sync/async collaboration, the differential versioned filesytem, and the undo stack, is really the same issue. If you can make a network protocol that does three-way diffs using the same data that is in the versioned filesystem, and keeps XML compliant to the DTD, anyone can use it for any data and they get versioning, collaboration, and undo/redo for free and sugar rules the world. [[User:Homunq|Homunq]] 06:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 11:31, 3 April 2009

But the point I want to make is that, you've heard me say it before, I think that the sync/async collaboration, the differential versioned filesytem, and the undo stack, is really the same issue. If you can make a network protocol that does three-way diffs using the same data that is in the versioned filesystem, and keeps XML compliant to the DTD, anyone can use it for any data and they get versioning, collaboration, and undo/redo for free and sugar rules the world. Homunq 06:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)