Difference between revisions of "Government FAQ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(FAQ format) |
m |
||
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <noinclude>{{ | + | <noinclude>{{TOCright}}</noinclude> |
+ | <includeonly><!-- this will show only on transclusion of this page as in Sugar Labs FAQ --> | ||
+ | ===[[Government FAQ|Governmental FAQ]]=== | ||
+ | </includeonly> | ||
+ | : Below are questions commonly asked by governmental officials about the OLPC and Sugar plans, with short answers here and links to longer discussions elsewhere. Please [[Talk:Government FAQ|'''add questions and answers''']] that you have encountered. | ||
+ | :Remember, It's An Education Program, not a laptop program. XOs are part of the story, and Sugar on any other supported Linux is another. | ||
− | + | ==Educational Benefits and Other Effects== | |
− | == | + | ===What's the evidence for XOs and Sugar in education?=== |
− | + | :Early results have shown gains in academic achievement, personal and social growth, and educational methods. Several trials have shown extremely promising results for immigrants struggling with a new language, and for students with disabilities of several kinds. We have also seen that these results do not occur automatically. Improper deployment can result in poor outcomes, as with any technology. However, several deployments, including Ethiopia and Nepal have returned improvements that astonished participants and researchers. | |
+ | |||
+ | :Further gains are expected when a full range of Free digital learning materials becomes readily available. At this point, computers will cost less than printed textbooks in most countries, particularly when the next generation of lower-cost computers appears. | ||
: See | : See | ||
− | * [ | + | :* [[olpc:OLPC research| Academic Papers]] |
− | * [ | + | :* [[olpc:Experience| Experience and Anecdotal Evidence]] |
− | * [[Education Team/Education Bibliographies|Education Bibliographies]] | + | :* [[Education Team/Education Bibliographies|Education Bibliographies]] |
+ | |||
+ | : If you would like to see more specific measures, please ask us. We are in contact with many educational research organizations. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Do I have to buy XOs in order to use Sugar?=== | ||
− | : If you | + | :Not at all. This is an education project, not a laptop project. Sugar runs on a wide variety of other computers, and on a number of versions of Linux. |
+ | |||
+ | :The choice of computers depends on your requirements. XOs have advantages where extreme low power is required, or ruggedness, or minimum cost. Other computers may be more appropriate in other situations, or for older students. If you have computers for all of your children now, you can put Linux and Sugar on them in several ways. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :* Install Sugar on your current Linux, if you have one | ||
+ | :* Dual boot with your current software, if you have Windows | ||
+ | :* Run Sugar in a Virtual Machine | ||
+ | :* Boot from LiveCD | ||
+ | :* Boot from Sugar on a Stick | ||
==OLPC and Partners== | ==OLPC and Partners== | ||
Line 23: | Line 42: | ||
===What is Sugar Labs?=== | ===What is Sugar Labs?=== | ||
− | : [http://www.sugarlabs.org/ Sugar Labs] is the non-profit/NGO responsible for the development of the Sugar educational software [[Sugar | + | : [http://www.sugarlabs.org/ Sugar Labs] is the non-profit/NGO responsible for the development of the Sugar educational software [[Sugar Software Stack| platform]]. |
:[[What is Sugar?|Sugar]] is the core component of a worldwide effort to provide every child with equal opportunity for a quality education. Available in 25 [http://translate.sugarlabs.org/ languages], Sugar’s [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/ Activities] are used every school day by almost one-million children in more than forty countries. Originally developed for the One Laptop per Child XO-1 netbook, Sugar [[Supported systems|runs on most computers]]. Sugar is [http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/ free and open-source software]. | :[[What is Sugar?|Sugar]] is the core component of a worldwide effort to provide every child with equal opportunity for a quality education. Available in 25 [http://translate.sugarlabs.org/ languages], Sugar’s [http://activities.sugarlabs.org/ Activities] are used every school day by almost one-million children in more than forty countries. Originally developed for the One Laptop per Child XO-1 netbook, Sugar [[Supported systems|runs on most computers]]. Sugar is [http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/ free and open-source software]. | ||
Line 31: | Line 50: | ||
: Sugar Labs is a spin-off of OLPC. They coordinate their work on XO hardware and Sugar software. | : Sugar Labs is a spin-off of OLPC. They coordinate their work on XO hardware and Sugar software. | ||
− | === | + | ===Which countries have one-to-one computer deployments?=== |
− | : | + | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Deployments XOs delivered, shipped or ordered] |
+ | * [http://news.squeak.org/2006/11/17/squeak-in-extremadura/ Extremadura] in Spain | ||
+ | * Venezuela, Intel Classmates with Caixa Mágica Linux | ||
+ | * Brazil, Mobilis tablet computers with Linux | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===What user groups work with XO and Sugar?=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | :This is a partial list. | ||
+ | |||
+ | :'''US''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_America OLPC America] (defunct) | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Birmingham OLPC Birmingham] Alabama | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/AZ_XO AZ XO] Arizona | ||
+ | * [http://olpcgoldenstate.blogspot.com/ OLPC Golden State] California | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_California OLPC California] California | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_SanFranciscoBayArea OLPC SanFranciscoBayArea] California | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Santa_Barbara OLPC Santa Barbara] California | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Middletown_Childrens_Project Middletown Childrens Project] Connecticut | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Yale_Interest_Group Yale Interest Group] Connecticut | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Learning_Club_D.C. OLPC Learning Club D.C.] District of Columbia | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Chicago OLPC Chicago] Illinois | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Orleans OLPC New Orleans] Louisiana | ||
+ | * [http://groups.google.com/group/lexo LeXO: Lexington XO Users Group] Massachusetts | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Olin_university_chapter Olin university chapter] Massachusetts | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Boston OLPC Boston] Massachusetts | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC-STL OLPC Saint Louis] Missouri | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Native_Ascent Native Ascent] Montana | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Santa_Fe_Complex_OLPC_Community Santa Fe Complex OLPC Community] New Mexico | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_York OLPC New York] New York | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Rochester%2C_NY OLPC Rochester, NY] New York | ||
+ | * [http://groups.google.com/group/olpc-rdu Raleigh-Durham group] North Carolina | ||
+ | * [http://groups.google.com/group/xohio XOhio] Ohio | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Portland PDX-OLPC Users] Oregon | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Eugene_XO_User_Group Eugene XO Users Workspace] Oregon | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Pennsylvania OLPC Pennsylvania] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Student_Technology_Outreach Student Technology Outreach] Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Xo-austin XO-Austin] Texas | ||
+ | * [http://dfwxo.blogspot.com/ Dallas FortWorth Area XO users group] Texas | ||
+ | * [http://www.olpcnews.com/use_cases/community/start_xo_user_club_houston.html Houston XO User Club] Texas | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_VermontSeaXO OLPC Vermont ] Vermont | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/SeaXO SeaXO] Washington | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Bellingham OLPC Bellingham] Washington | ||
+ | |||
+ | :'''International''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Afghanistan OLPC Afghanistan] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Albania OLPC Albania] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Argentina OLPC Argentina] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Belgium OLPC Belgium] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Benin OLPC Benin] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Bhutan OLPC Bhutan] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Brazil OLPC Brazil] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Cambodia OLPC Cambodia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Catalunya OLPC Catalunya] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Canada OLPC Canada] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Chile OLPC Chile] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_China OLPC China] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Colombia OLPC Colombia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Cyprus OLPC Cyprus] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:OLPC_Ecuador OLPC Ecuador] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Egypt OLPC Egypt] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Ethiopia OLPC Ethiopia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_France OLPC France] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Germany OLPC Germany] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Ghana OLPC Ghana] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Greece OLPC Greece] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_India OLPC India] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Iraq OLPC Iraq] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Israel OLPC Israel] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Japan OLPC Japan] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Kenya OLPC Kenya] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Korea OLPC Korea] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Laos OLPC Laos] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Libya OLPC Libya] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Malaysia OLPC Malaysia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:OLPC_Mexico OLPC Mexico] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Mongolia OLPC Mongolia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Myanmar OLPC Myanmar] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Nepal OLPC Nepal] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Netherlands OLPC Netherlands] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_New_Zealand OLPC New Zealand] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Nigeria OLPC Nigeria] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Pakistan OLPC Pakistan] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:OLPC_Paraguay OLPC Paraguay] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Category:OLPC_Peru OLPC Peru] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Philippines OLPC Philippines] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Poland OLPC Poland] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Rwanda OLPC Rwanda] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Russia OLPC Russia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Slovenia OLPC Slovenia] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Sri_Lanka OLPC Sri Lanka] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_South_Africa OLPC South Africa] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Taiwan OLPC Taiwan] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Thailand OLPC Thailand] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_UK OLPC UK] | ||
+ | * [http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Uruguay OLPC Uruguay] | ||
: ''Are they official parts of OLPC?'' | : ''Are they official parts of OLPC?'' | ||
− | :: | + | :: No, they are groups of volunteers, sometimes associated with a school, university, or NGO. |
==XO== | ==XO== | ||
Line 43: | Line 158: | ||
===What is the XO?=== | ===What is the XO?=== | ||
− | : [[olpc:XO | XO: The Children's Machine]] | + | : See [[olpc:XO | XO: The Children's Machine]]. |
===Does the XO run Microsoft Windows?=== | ===Does the XO run Microsoft Windows?=== | ||
− | : | + | : Microsoft prepared a special version of Windows XP for the XO-1 (see [[OLPC:Windows]]), but has not marketed it. |
===Why not use Windows?=== | ===Why not use Windows?=== | ||
Line 54: | Line 169: | ||
: You may hear the argument that schoolchildren should use the tools that are the de facto standard in business and government offices. There are several objections to this theory, particularly as it applies to Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office. | : You may hear the argument that schoolchildren should use the tools that are the de facto standard in business and government offices. There are several objections to this theory, particularly as it applies to Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office. | ||
− | * Linux, Sugar, and other Free Software comes with source code, so that more advanced students can learn from it and improve it. In particular, it can be adapted to any local language requirements without asking permission from a vendor. | + | :* Linux, Sugar, and other Free Software comes with source code, so that more advanced students can learn from it and improve it. In particular, it can be adapted to any local language requirements without asking permission from a vendor. |
− | * It will be 6-12 years before children now in elementary school (grades 1-6) graduate from a secondary school, and either enter the workforce or go on to higher education. If you look at the software of 6-12 years ago, and compare it with what is in use today, you will see that this idea would not have worked well in the past, and is unlikely to work better in the future. | + | :* It will be 6-12 years before children now in elementary school (grades 1-6) graduate from a secondary school, and either enter the workforce or go on to higher education. If you look at the software of 6-12 years ago, and compare it with what is in use today, you will see that this idea would not have worked well in the past, and is unlikely to work better in the future. |
− | * The only constant in the world today is change. Children need to learn to adapt, not learn to use only one kind of software. | + | :* The only constant in the world today is change. Children need to learn to adapt, not learn to use only one kind of software. |
− | * We do not know what will be the de facto standard in business and government 6-12 years from now. Many countries are considering converting all of their operations to Free Software. | + | :* We do not know what will be the de facto standard in business and government 6-12 years from now. Many countries are considering converting all of their operations to Free Software. |
− | * That isn't how we teach children anything else. | + | :* That isn't how we teach children anything else. |
===What does the XO cost?=== | ===What does the XO cost?=== | ||
Line 72: | Line 187: | ||
: OLPC provides | : OLPC provides | ||
− | * XOs | + | :* XOs |
− | * School servers | + | :* School servers |
− | * Sugar software | + | :* Sugar software |
− | * Creative-Commons licensed learning content | + | :* Creative-Commons licensed learning content |
− | * Some localization | + | :* Some localization |
: OLPC does not provide | : OLPC does not provide | ||
− | * Electricity | + | :* Electricity |
− | * Internet | + | :* Internet |
− | * Teacher training | + | :* Teacher training |
+ | :* Curriculum planning | ||
: Open Learning Exchange, Earth Treasury, and other organizations can assist with these requirements. | : Open Learning Exchange, Earth Treasury, and other organizations can assist with these requirements. | ||
Line 93: | Line 209: | ||
: Children, especially poor children in areas lacking infrastructure, need computers that are | : Children, especially poor children in areas lacking infrastructure, need computers that are | ||
− | * rugged | + | :* rugged |
− | * safe | + | :* safe |
− | * secure | + | :* secure |
− | * inexpensive | + | :* inexpensive |
− | * environmentally friendly | + | :* environmentally friendly |
− | * able to run on limited power | + | :* able to run on limited power |
− | * able to communicate in the absence of the Internet | + | :* able to communicate in the absence of the Internet |
− | * fast enough | + | :* fast enough |
− | * capacious enough | + | :* capacious enough |
− | * able to run the best education software | + | :* able to run the best education software |
− | * usable in sunlight | + | :* usable in sunlight |
− | |||
− | |||
+ | :These are not the questions asked by prosperous buyers, who usually want the biggest and fastest computers they can afford. There are, of course, many computers with faster processors, more memory, and more storage than the XO, but no others designed specifically to meet the stringent requirements of children. On the other hand, older students probably should not have to use the very small XO keyboard. | ||
+ | <noinclude> | ||
===?=== | ===?=== | ||
− | + | </noinclude> | |
[[Category:FAQ]] | [[Category:FAQ]] |
Latest revision as of 12:34, 22 March 2010
- Below are questions commonly asked by governmental officials about the OLPC and Sugar plans, with short answers here and links to longer discussions elsewhere. Please add questions and answers that you have encountered.
- Remember, It's An Education Program, not a laptop program. XOs are part of the story, and Sugar on any other supported Linux is another.
Educational Benefits and Other Effects
What's the evidence for XOs and Sugar in education?
- Early results have shown gains in academic achievement, personal and social growth, and educational methods. Several trials have shown extremely promising results for immigrants struggling with a new language, and for students with disabilities of several kinds. We have also seen that these results do not occur automatically. Improper deployment can result in poor outcomes, as with any technology. However, several deployments, including Ethiopia and Nepal have returned improvements that astonished participants and researchers.
- Further gains are expected when a full range of Free digital learning materials becomes readily available. At this point, computers will cost less than printed textbooks in most countries, particularly when the next generation of lower-cost computers appears.
- See
- If you would like to see more specific measures, please ask us. We are in contact with many educational research organizations.
Do I have to buy XOs in order to use Sugar?
- Not at all. This is an education project, not a laptop project. Sugar runs on a wide variety of other computers, and on a number of versions of Linux.
- The choice of computers depends on your requirements. XOs have advantages where extreme low power is required, or ruggedness, or minimum cost. Other computers may be more appropriate in other situations, or for older students. If you have computers for all of your children now, you can put Linux and Sugar on them in several ways.
- Install Sugar on your current Linux, if you have one
- Dual boot with your current software, if you have Windows
- Run Sugar in a Virtual Machine
- Boot from LiveCD
- Boot from Sugar on a Stick
OLPC and Partners
What is One Laptop Per Child?
- Mission Statement: To create educational opportunities for the world's poorest children by providing each child with a rugged, low-cost, low-power, connected laptop with content and software designed for collaborative, joyful, self-empowered learning. When children have access to this type of tool they get engaged in their own education. They learn, share, create, and collaborate. They become connected to each other, to the world and to a brighter future.
What is Sugar Labs?
- Sugar Labs is the non-profit/NGO responsible for the development of the Sugar educational software platform.
- Sugar is the core component of a worldwide effort to provide every child with equal opportunity for a quality education. Available in 25 languages, Sugar’s Activities are used every school day by almost one-million children in more than forty countries. Originally developed for the One Laptop per Child XO-1 netbook, Sugar runs on most computers. Sugar is free and open-source software.
- Sugar Labs is a spin-off of OLPC. They coordinate their work on XO hardware and Sugar software.
Which countries have one-to-one computer deployments?
- XOs delivered, shipped or ordered
- Extremadura in Spain
- Venezuela, Intel Classmates with Caixa Mágica Linux
- Brazil, Mobilis tablet computers with Linux
What user groups work with XO and Sugar?
- This is a partial list.
- US
- OLPC America (defunct)
- OLPC Birmingham Alabama
- AZ XO Arizona
- OLPC Golden State California
- OLPC California California
- OLPC SanFranciscoBayArea California
- OLPC Santa Barbara California
- Middletown Childrens Project Connecticut
- Yale Interest Group Connecticut
- OLPC Learning Club D.C. District of Columbia
- OLPC Chicago Illinois
- OLPC New Orleans Louisiana
- LeXO: Lexington XO Users Group Massachusetts
- Olin university chapter Massachusetts
- OLPC Boston Massachusetts
- OLPC Saint Louis Missouri
- Native Ascent Montana
- Santa Fe Complex OLPC Community New Mexico
- OLPC New York New York
- OLPC Rochester, NY New York
- Raleigh-Durham group North Carolina
- XOhio Ohio
- PDX-OLPC Users Oregon
- Eugene XO Users Workspace Oregon
- OLPC Pennsylvania
- Student Technology Outreach Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- XO-Austin Texas
- Dallas FortWorth Area XO users group Texas
- Houston XO User Club Texas
- OLPC Vermont Vermont
- SeaXO Washington
- OLPC Bellingham Washington
- International
- OLPC Afghanistan
- OLPC Albania
- OLPC Argentina
- OLPC Belgium
- OLPC Benin
- OLPC Bhutan
- OLPC Brazil
- OLPC Cambodia
- OLPC Catalunya
- OLPC Canada
- OLPC Chile
- OLPC China
- OLPC Colombia
- OLPC Cyprus
- OLPC Ecuador
- OLPC Egypt
- OLPC Ethiopia
- OLPC France
- OLPC Germany
- OLPC Ghana
- OLPC Greece
- OLPC India
- OLPC Iraq
- OLPC Israel
- OLPC Japan
- OLPC Kenya
- OLPC Korea
- OLPC Laos
- OLPC Libya
- OLPC Malaysia
- OLPC Mexico
- OLPC Mongolia
- OLPC Myanmar
- OLPC Nepal
- OLPC Netherlands
- OLPC New Zealand
- OLPC Nigeria
- OLPC Pakistan
- OLPC Paraguay
- OLPC Peru
- OLPC Philippines
- OLPC Poland
- OLPC Rwanda
- OLPC Russia
- OLPC Slovenia
- OLPC Sri Lanka
- OLPC South Africa
- OLPC Taiwan
- OLPC Thailand
- OLPC UK
- OLPC Uruguay
- Are they official parts of OLPC?
- No, they are groups of volunteers, sometimes associated with a school, university, or NGO.
XO
What is the XO?
Does the XO run Microsoft Windows?
- Microsoft prepared a special version of Windows XP for the XO-1 (see OLPC:Windows), but has not marketed it.
Why not use Windows?
- Windows imposes extra costs at every turn for upgrades and applications, and does not run the Sugar education software.
- You may hear the argument that schoolchildren should use the tools that are the de facto standard in business and government offices. There are several objections to this theory, particularly as it applies to Microsoft Windows and Microsoft Office.
- Linux, Sugar, and other Free Software comes with source code, so that more advanced students can learn from it and improve it. In particular, it can be adapted to any local language requirements without asking permission from a vendor.
- It will be 6-12 years before children now in elementary school (grades 1-6) graduate from a secondary school, and either enter the workforce or go on to higher education. If you look at the software of 6-12 years ago, and compare it with what is in use today, you will see that this idea would not have worked well in the past, and is unlikely to work better in the future.
- The only constant in the world today is change. Children need to learn to adapt, not learn to use only one kind of software.
- We do not know what will be the de facto standard in business and government 6-12 years from now. Many countries are considering converting all of their operations to Free Software.
- That isn't how we teach children anything else.
What does the XO cost?
- Currently, the cost is $189 in quantity, starting at 10,000 units.
What else will we need to pay for?
- OLPC provides
- XOs
- School servers
- Sugar software
- Creative-Commons licensed learning content
- Some localization
- OLPC does not provide
- Electricity
- Internet
- Teacher training
- Curriculum planning
- Open Learning Exchange, Earth Treasury, and other organizations can assist with these requirements.
Other Platform Options
What should I consider when evaluating computers for education?
- The first question is, What do our students need? The answer to that question determines what weight to give the rest of the questions.
- Children, especially poor children in areas lacking infrastructure, need computers that are
- rugged
- safe
- secure
- inexpensive
- environmentally friendly
- able to run on limited power
- able to communicate in the absence of the Internet
- fast enough
- capacious enough
- able to run the best education software
- usable in sunlight
- These are not the questions asked by prosperous buyers, who usually want the biggest and fastest computers they can afford. There are, of course, many computers with faster processors, more memory, and more storage than the XO, but no others designed specifically to meet the stringent requirements of children. On the other hand, older students probably should not have to use the very small XO keyboard.