Jump to content

Decision panels/SOAS: Difference between revisions

From Sugar Labs
Sj (talk | contribs)
quote
Sj (talk | contribs)
.
Line 3: Line 3:
== Mandate ==
== Mandate ==
{{quote|
{{quote|
We appointed a decision panel (by a vote of 3 for, 0 against, 1 abstain, 3 absent) with the following mandate:
:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:  
:"Investigate the situation of how SoaS should be treated by Sugar Labs, and related questions, including answers to the following:  
:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"  
:* "Should Sugar Labs be a GNU/Linux distributor, rather than just an upstream producing Sugar releases?"  
Line 24: Line 23:
* Daniel Drake
* Daniel Drake
* Abhishek Indoria  
* Abhishek Indoria  
== Process ==
The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.


[[category:decision panels]]
[[category:decision panels]]

Revision as of 18:33, 26 September 2009

A 12-person SOAS decision panel was appointed by a September, 2009 Oversight Board decision.

Mandate

Template:Quote

Members

  • Sebastian Dziallas
  • Luke Faraone
  • Martin Dengler
  • Bill Bogstad
  • Faisal Khan
  • Benjamin M. Schwartz
  • Samuel Klein
  • Sean Daly
  • Tabitha Roder
  • Caryl Bigenho
  • Daniel Drake
  • Abhishek Indoria


Process

The process for discussion and reaching a decision is not yet set.