Testing/Reports/Sweets on Raspberry pi armhf raspbian

From Sugar Labs
< Testing‎ | Reports
Revision as of 20:50, 11 July 2012 by Inkyfingers (talk | contribs) (prepare for update)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Sugar on a Raspberry pi is functional, robust, stable, and testable unsupervised by children (in progress).

Test report Sugar 0.94

Product of the command 

   sweets  sdk/sugar:emulator

Raspberry pi, running OS from http://www.raspbian.org/ (pisces image) on a SanDisk 4 GB, class 4, SDHC card.

Sweets, following these instructions Platform Team/Guide/Sugar via Sweets

From my computer

Build: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable
Sugar: 0.94.1

All Function keys, F1 to 6, work fine All Views and avatars seen correctly, without error. Software Updates fully functional. These tested Activities fully functional. Calculate v.40 - Chat v.77 - Edit v.8 - HorseGame v.4 - IRC v.10 - Implode v.12 Log v.29 - Labyrinth v.12 - Maze v.21 - Memorize v.4 - Moon v.14 - Pippy v.49 - Physics v.10 - SprayPlay v.2 - Sugar Commander v.8 - Terminal v.40 - Turtle Art v.149 - TurtleConfusion v.10.

GUI Activity install

Without a working browser, we can use the host browser, midori, and pcmanfm unzip tool.

Select a new Activity from ASLO, http://activities.sugarlabs.org//en-US/sugar/ . (Packages selected to run in Sugar 0.94.1 can be identified in ASLO, using "Advanced Search"). Using Midori, download chosen Activities to, say, ~/downloads. Open ~/downloads with pcmanfm, select the NewActivity.xo, right click, chose extract to, enter ~/Activities, press Save. The Activity will unzip ready to use. You can check in ~/Activities that you have NewActivity.activity

Fixed Items

Earlier in the process, to fix: 

ImportError: No module named vte
ImportError: No module named gst
ImportError: No module named pygame

sudo apt-get install python-vte python-gst0.10 python-pygame

Still to Fix

Issues being fixed, update shortly. Inkyfingers 21:50, 11 July 2012 (EDT)

Is there a sys.path issue? No

Is there an issue in this area - ie change of architecture? http://docs.python.org/library/fpectl.html#limitations-and-other-considerations? No

As a known issue (for Debian), suggested dependencies, i.e., -S sweets command argument, don't work for now.

Why does -S option not work in Debian?

Retrieved from "https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/index.php?title=Testing/Reports/Sweets_on_Raspberry_pi_armhf_raspbian&oldid=80966"