Difference between revisions of "Features/Parental controls"

From Sugar Labs
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
==The proposal==
==The proposal==
==Default or optional feature==
==Default or optional feature==

Revision as of 21:07, 23 April 2014

The proposal


Default or optional feature

Marketing case

"Not only am I basing this on the inclusion of a similar feature in OS X, I am also basing this on the fact that some Nigerian children reportedly visited a Web site containing pornography. I have no other evidence." (Ryan)

How often would this feature be used? How do we estimate this?

Education case

Does this feature enhance or detract from Sugar's effectiveness for facilitating learning.

A central platform of OLPC and Sugar is that children should be creators rather than consumers. This has been facilitated in a number of ways, show source, cloning Activities, easy reflashing of the OS. Any locking down of the software would be inconsistent with the design philosophy.


There are a number of potential ways to circumvent parental controls

  • switching to Gnome
  • using Pippy to create a browser
  • using Turtle Blocks to create a browser (yes its easy!)
  • using Develop to create a browser
  • cloning an Activity
  • installing another browser Activity
  • installing Browse with an altered name
  • reflashing with a different build

Unintended consequences