Jump to content

Marketing Team/Events/MiniCamp Paris 2009/Christoph's Notes: Difference between revisions

From Sugar Labs
ChristophD (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Here's a list of notes from the various sessions and discussions I attended here at [[MiniCamp Paris 2009]].
{{TOCright}}
Here's a list of notes from the various sessions and discussions I attended here at [[../]].


== Sessions ==
== Sessions ==
Line 8: Line 9:
* timeframe for 0.6: July (?)
* timeframe for 0.6: July (?)
* bootable SD card to turn an (unlocked) XO into an XS
* bootable SD card to turn an (unlocked) XO into an XS
* improved ejabberd setup


=== GCompris ===
=== GCompris ===
Line 24: Line 26:
** GNOME 2.28 (final release: Sept. 23)
** GNOME 2.28 (final release: Sept. 23)
** Fedora 12 release (final freeze: Sept. 22, final release: Nov 3rd)
** Fedora 12 release (final freeze: Sept. 22, final release: Nov 3rd)
* considerations about how to include the artefacts produced by the Google Summer of Code projects (=>communicate with GSoC students and mentors)
* considerations about how to include the artefacts produced by the Google Summer of Code projects (=>'''communicate with GSoC students and mentors''')
* focus on bug fixes
* focus on bug fixes
** clean up and consolidation of Trac
** clean up and consolidation of Trac
* switch from Matchbox to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacity Metacity]
* switch from Matchbox to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacity Metacity]
* toolbars: redesign of default view
* toolbars: [http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Design_Team/Designs/Toolbars redesign of default view]
* experimentation with new features (mostly in terms of designs and concepts, not necessarily implemented in Sugar-core code)
* experimentation with new features (mostly in terms of designs and concepts, not necessarily implemented in Sugar-core code)
** Group view
** Group view
** reward system
** reward system
** audio subsystem
** audio subsystem
* general discussion on the question of what features are important (need input  
* general discussion on the question of what features are important (input from deployments and pilot sites is badly needed)


== Random Discussions ==
== Random Discussions ==
Line 60: Line 62:
* find suitable location for meetups
* find suitable location for meetups
* find accomodation for attending people (Urban Camping)
* find accomodation for attending people (Urban Camping)
* announce rough agenda in due time


=== During Event ===
=== During Event ===
Line 66: Line 69:
* announce how remote contributors can attend during the event
* announce how remote contributors can attend during the event
** preferably organize a certain time-slot (e.g. mid-day and/or at the end of the day)
** preferably organize a certain time-slot (e.g. mid-day and/or at the end of the day)
* end with what people liked and didn't like


=== Post-Event ===
=== Post-Event ===


* end with what people liked and didn't like
* follow up on what was discussed
* follow up on what was discussed
* make summaries of what was discussed available to the larger community
* make summaries of what was discussed available to the larger community

Latest revision as of 19:10, 24 February 2010

Here's a list of notes from the various sessions and discussions I attended here at Marketing Team/Events/MiniCamp Paris 2009.

Sessions

School Server

  • XS-0.6 is looking sweet;-)
  • timeframe for 0.6: July (?)
  • bootable SD card to turn an (unlocked) XO into an XS
  • improved ejabberd setup

GCompris

  • need a maintainer for the Sugar branch (!)
  • GCompris admin interface and student progress => something we need for all Sugar activities

OLPC Quebeque

  • get template of 'in-school-use document'

Sugar 0.86

  • information subject of change so take it with a grain of salt and await details and confirmation from the actual development team
  • estimated release: end of September, to coincide with...
    • GNOME 2.28 (final release: Sept. 23)
    • Fedora 12 release (final freeze: Sept. 22, final release: Nov 3rd)
  • considerations about how to include the artefacts produced by the Google Summer of Code projects (=>communicate with GSoC students and mentors)
  • focus on bug fixes
    • clean up and consolidation of Trac
  • switch from Matchbox to Metacity
  • toolbars: redesign of default view
  • experimentation with new features (mostly in terms of designs and concepts, not necessarily implemented in Sugar-core code)
    • Group view
    • reward system
    • audio subsystem
  • general discussion on the question of what features are important (input from deployments and pilot sites is badly needed)

Random Discussions

  • How can European grassroots initiate and run successful Sugar pilot?
  • frameworks, frameworks, frameworks
  • Uruguay contact (Italian students)
  • improve research angle, collect related information and contacts from around the world

Organization of similar future events

General thoughts

  • 2 Sugar focused days as minimum (4 days as a maximum)
  • WiFi needs to be available all the time
  • location should have one large room to assemble everyone, smaller seperate spaces to get work done
  • food and drinks should be available (Lebanese food prefered;-)
  • don't put too much strain on one person (e.g. Sean during Sugar Camp Paris 2009)
  • make it possible for remote contributors to attend during the event

Pre-Event

  • announce meeting date and location in due time
  • find sponsorship for event
  • find suitable location for meetups
  • find accomodation for attending people (Urban Camping)
  • announce rough agenda in due time

During Event

  • introductory round at the beginning of the day (esp. when new people are present)
  • announce how remote contributors can attend during the event
    • preferably organize a certain time-slot (e.g. mid-day and/or at the end of the day)
  • end with what people liked and didn't like

Post-Event

  • follow up on what was discussed
  • make summaries of what was discussed available to the larger community