Difference between revisions of "Features/Smart Objects"
< Features
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* [[Talk:Features/Smart Objects#Mokurai & alsroot discussion | Mokurai & alsroot discussion]] | * [[Talk:Features/Smart Objects#Mokurai & alsroot discussion | Mokurai & alsroot discussion]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Implementations == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Might be useful to treat Sugar Network as a [[Talk:Sugar_Network/Concept#Clouds|cloud for Journal objects]]. | ||
{{Special:PrefixIndex/{{PAGENAMEE}}/}} | {{Special:PrefixIndex/{{PAGENAMEE}}/}} | ||
Latest revision as of 11:11, 7 January 2012
The problems teachers complain about
- Students remove useful Journal objects to free the space for other purposes.
- Lack of storage space on the XO to keep all the objects kids want
- Having only the current backup procedure (backup/restore entirely journal) is awkward. If you need to keep only particular objects, this workflow is too ineffective and force users to calculate trade-offs between loosing some files in order to restore others.
Solutions
Please create your page under this one with describing:
- how your solution works from students pov
- how your solution works from teachers pov
Pages
Implementations
- Might be useful to treat Sugar Network as a cloud for Journal objects.