Talk:Marketing Team: Difference between revisions
m Talk:MarketingTeam moved to Talk:Marketing Team: deCamel casing |
m smolt as a way to audit sugar usage? |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The [http://www.curriki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Partners folks that partner with Curriki] should be approached about possible interest in adapting their materials for Sugar deployments. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 05:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | The [http://www.curriki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Partners folks that partner with Curriki] should be approached about possible interest in adapting their materials for Sugar deployments. [[User:Cjl|Cjl]] 05:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Smolt Profiles used for audits?== | |||
Is it possible to use the fedora smolt reports as a way to get usage audits? [[User:satellit|satellit]] | |||
Revision as of 08:09, 13 January 2010
Echo Gregorio - I'd like to at least lurk here for a bit, until I get a better sense of how much time I'll have to contribute - this is definitely something I would love to learn to do, and help out with. Mchua 23:09, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Possible partners
The folks that partner with Curriki should be approached about possible interest in adapting their materials for Sugar deployments. Cjl 05:19, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Smolt Profiles used for audits?
Is it possible to use the fedora smolt reports as a way to get usage audits? satellit