Difference between revisions of "BugSquad/Meetings/Minutes/2008-12-17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved BugSquad/Meetings/Minutes/2008-12-17 to Walter is a wanker 11/Meetings/Minutes/2008-12-17: Walter is a wanker) |
m (moved Walter is a wanker 11/Meetings/Minutes/2008-12-17 to BugSquad/Meetings/Minutes/2008-12-17 over redirect: revert) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 20:34, 23 February 2010
- Do we agree on the mission?
- http://sugarlabs.org/go/BugSquad/Mission (got accepted)
- What is needed in trac to start triaging?
- add sucrose components
- add milestones
- base work flow on http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Trac_ticket_workflow
- distribution field (where was the bug found)
- Meetings: when/if
- schedule weekly triage meetings (especially to get people started, but things should be setup so that triaging happens async, because it needs to be a continuous)
- at #sugar-meeting
- Sprints: when/if
- after releases
- at #sugar-meeting
- Do we need a dedicated mailing list?
- No, we mostly have announcements and use tags for cases like: "I was triaging bug #567 but didn't know what to do?"
- sugar-devel - [bugsquad] and [bugsquad][announce]
- wiki note: "you can always triage at any time, and if you'd like to schedule your own sugar triage sprint, please do and announce it $here! if you're new and want help getting started but can't make a sprint, ask $here_2."
- irc questions at #sugar
- Create a list of concrete tasks we expect the BugSquad to do regularly
- solicit distributions for testing of new releases
- maintain the BugSquad wiki pages (especially with policies like "we use #sugar for discussion, tag your sugar-devel posts this way")
- add components, tags, milestones
- triage tickets
- provide feedback on how to improve bug advocacy on a ticket, when requested. ("How could I have written this bug report better / which developers should I ping on it"?)
- Triage Policy:
- Who is responsible for setting priorities and milestones?
- the bug gets in
- bug squad make the bug nice (a well-written bug report, a suggestion on the next step to push it to developers for fixing - who to talk to, etc.), assign to maintainer
- maintainer assign a milestone
- the dev does fix it
- What needs to be happen to mark a ticket as fixed?
- not fully discussed the policy
- Who is responsible for setting priorities and milestones?
- Action items:
- #ACTION: marcopg to look at the upstream/downstream interaction fedora+GNOME
- #ACTION: mungwell to look at the upstream/downstream interaction ubuntu+GNOME (launchpad)
- #ACTION: erikos clean up wiki with today's info
- #ACTION: erikos work on trac with marcopg