Activities/Activity Library

Ideas

• support 0install by design
  • use .xo format only if user requested .xo creating
  • otherwise, activities should just start by click

• support forks
  • bundle_id should not be owned by someone, for the same bundle_id there could be dozens of activities (and not only direct forks)

• no strict editors policy
  • by default (or at least there should be such option), any user can launch any activity w/o additional steps (like be logged in on ASLO)
  • there might be review profiles, user can apply such profile to disperse all activities to reviewed groups e.g. Featured, Major, Trash etc.

• support 0install stability profiles e.g. Stable, Development, Buggy

• support local user profile e.g.
  • use only Stable versions
  • make my-favorite-developer's activities all time in using list

• one button click update i.e. synchronize current activities w/ server's (taking into account

• provide easy to use by activity developers (option in activity.info) and easy to view by Actiivty Library users, centralized stats
  • successful/failed launch of what SP, could be useful to judge activity stability
  • average time of using/number of launches/etc

Hierarchy of libraries

On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 01:58:34PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 08:46:06AM -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> > Will it support multiple libraries, for the same of decentralizing
> > things?
> > 
> > I can imagine that many deployments would want a hierarchical thing to
> > save bandwidth and delegate decisions to school principals: the
> > schoolserver would be the first place where children search for
> > activities, then would come the deployment server and lastly ASLO.
> 
> Thanks, this hierarchical structure will be useful not only on pure
> server side but on peers side as well, like:
> 
> * someone added bunch of cool activities to his list (w/o
>   downloading|launching them)
> * shares his Activity_Library instance
> * any joined user can see|download|launch these activities